At one high school, more of the students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many of students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignment. The school is considering making a change to help decrease the number of students who cheat on homework. Which one of the following actions do you think will be most effective? And why?
Although many believe parents monitor or increasing the penalty can prevent students cheating on their assignments, I, on the other hand, believe creating new, difficult homework assignments is the better way to prevent students cheating on their homework. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following.
To begin with, in modern life, both parents have to work to provide their family good life style. Thus, they are not at home always, and they cannot monitor their children as they do their homework. Therefore, this methods does not work, not only that but students access to very sophisticate devices and they can easily connect to the internet with them, which means it is very hard to prevent them from cheating. For instance, when I was high school student, My parents bought me an IPod touch for my birthday. it was great device, because I could connect to the internet with that. Although both of my parents worked, but I had limited access to my computer, because my father tough this work prevent me to cheating while he was out. Hence, I could access to my iPod even when my parents was home, and I could find my homework assignments via that. My IPod gave me that opportunity to cheating and my parents did not notice that.
Moreover, increasing cheating penalty is not a permanent method, and I believe it would lead to more misbehavior. Because, student tend to finish their homework as fast as they can, thus they attempt to find new cheating way which is harder to noticed by teacher or even parents. My own experience is a good example of this. when I was university student, to avoid high penalty of cheating I used new ink-jet printer to copy my assignment. This helped me to create hand write looks to my assignments and also I could create my design in computer CAD program and gave them to my teacher as hand draw one.
Therefore, it is better to ask teacher to create homework assignments that will make it more difficult for students to cheat, because not only the answer of this kind of questions is not find in internet but because it improve students creativity.
In conclusion, it is fore all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe asking teachers to create homework assignments that will make cheating more difficult for students. This is because parents cannot always monitor their children, and because students find more complicated cheating methods, and because this way improve students creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n as they do their homework. Therefore, this methods does not work, not only that bu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ought me an IPod touch for my birthday. it was great device, because I could conne...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...n experience is a good example of this. when I was university student, to avoid high...
^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improves'?
Suggestion: improves
... is not find in internet but because it improve students creativity. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because it improve students creativity. In conclusion, it is fore all the aforem...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88179669031 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61641577496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451536643026 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.774522069 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265365639643 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875043771563 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742245234687 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178442837203 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393571160016 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.