In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age

It is hard to deny that many adults do not start to learn the skills required until they enter the industries, which leads impressionable people to generate that children are unnecessary to learn financial skills in their childhood since they will naturally acquire these skills from work. As far as the cultivation of good habits, daily activities needs, and family burden reduction are concerned, I firmly believe that children should learn to manage their money at a young age to become financially responsible when they grow up.

First and foremost, teaching children financial management can help them build good spending and saving habits, as it is wise to get early prepared since they will have to manage their own money in the future. Meanwhile, parents can introduce the concept of earned pocket money and encourage children to save some or all of this money. Not to mention that parents can provide their children with a valuable lesson on budgeting and learning the value of the items they are saving to obtain by showing their children how to put away some of their pocket money every week or month to afford to buy a more significant item.

Furthermore, the fact that even to children, shopping is an inevitable daily activity indicates that parents need to teach their children the value of shopping around, which is one important way to manage money successfully. Take the case of my young cousin, whose parents attach great importance to children's financial education. When my cousin has decided to save up to buy a more expensive item, his parents will take him to several shops before buying the item to show him the price difference. Buying in one store rather than another might mean they can buy their chosen item a few weeks sooner. Had it not been for his parents' supportive attitudes towards developing children's financial skills, my cousin might lose the chance to understand the value of shopping around.

Nevertheless, a voice arises that children learning how to manage money waste their time because they will naturally learn them when they grow up. Ironically, children who master financial skills earlier than others can help reduce their family's burden. They can achieve financial income to meet their household bills, save for their college, or cover their entertainment expenses. Therefore, children learn these skills to save money or earn money and lower their family bills to some extent, enabling their parents to save for retirement, children's college tuition, or another long-term financial goal.

In a nutshell, I maintain that children ought to learn how to manage their own money to become responsible. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from Penelope Fitzgerald goes, it is interesting to note that everyone has a different take on the world, a different opinion, and given the same inputs have completely different outputs, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir own money in the future. Meanwhile, parents can introduce the concept of ear...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2497.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1063394683 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59988582935 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511247443763 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.966654926 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.882352941 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7647058824 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392787063451 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139655628032 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112857712615 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228607753116 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892836899105 0.0645574589148 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.