Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
Our ancestors lived a rudimentary lifestyle which is very close to nature. Their way of living had helped us get all the valuable use of Earth’s resources now. I personally believe that people nowadays have become more selfish and not at all have a concern about future generations. We have used almost all the valuable natural resources like petrol, forests, fresh water and on the edge of making them extinct. I certainly agree with the statement that says, our current lifestyle will have a negative impact on future generations. Some of the reasons why I feel this way are discussed in the below essay.
First of all, the earth is polluted to the maximum level and it’s high time to take action on climate change and global warming. The measure to curb pollution need to be taken on larger scale which makes it very difficult and expensive. Countries are trying to avoid taking necessary measures because of this difficulty. To illustrate, there are tons of laws that forbid use of plastic. But all these laws are never implemented and plastic is ubiquitous even today. This is because they are no cost effective alternatives to plastic and no cost effective methods to dispose plastic. Such activities shows how people are not concerned about the future generations.
Secondly, it is a well know fact that children follow the footprints of their parents. Every child learns a lot from parents and the environment around him. So it is necessary to create some positive vibe around the child. This would ensure the child to behave good. On the other hand, if the circumstances are not terrible there are high chances that the child end up having really awful behaviour. The selfish nature of people nowadays should not be followed by future impact, so we must create a positive environment.
Finally, the growth of the internet has given lot of exposure to younger generations. They are influenced by people all over the world. Even if we make sure the circumstances of children are ethical, the virtual world of internet may not be same. Also, there is no check on the content on internet. There are loads of websites that spread negativity. Such acts are really terrible and people behind them should be punished. My personal experience is a compelling example to this, one of my nephew who used to be a mobile phone addict was lured by some websites and looted money from him. This may definitely influence some other kids/adults to follow the same and ultimately spoil the ethical values of generations.
In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that our lives would definitely have negative impact on future generations. This is because we are spoiling earth and implicitly influencing children to pursue wrongdoings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... negative impact on future generations. Some of the reasons why I feel this way are discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...ods to dispose plastic. Such activities shows how people are not concerned about the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
...ery child learns a lot from parents and the environment around him. So it is necessary to create some posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94989106754 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67752179952 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531590413943 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8167610414 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3448275862 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8275862069 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34482758621 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181259934129 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437029363498 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960469786695 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116100547079 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116232145237 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.