Our current way of life will have negative impact on future generations
The advent of technology has brought a raft of advantages and improvements in the way we live nowadays. Almost everything we do today is affected and dependent on it. It has changed the way we think and the way we spend our free time. There is a different trend in every generation, and we keep upgrading. Something that was out of the box in a generation might be mundane in another. We keep constantly evolving and changing our habits. There have been lot of discussions around whether our current way of life affects future generations, I agree that it does based on several reasons.
To begin with, our youth / children will consciously, or sub consciously imitate what they see happening around them. They will tend to behave like most of their family members or friends. Our current generation is heavily influenced by social media. People spend hours browsing through social media apps and binge-watching TV series. We prefer to stay indoors, connect over video calls, and play indoor games. When the next generation watches us do this, they blend in. Social media was a big change in our generation, it was something that we had not experienced before so it was a huge transformation for us. For the next generation it would not be, they might think that connecting on social media, not meeting personally and just connecting on video calls is the way things happen. They would probably go outside less often, travel less and explore less which precludes them from having different experiences.
A future generation is a direct or indirect derivative of the current generation. Let us take an example of the industrial revolution. The way we work, the way goods are produced today are a derivative of the changes that happened due to the industrial revolution. Our modern life was built upon the very changes brought by the revolution. Similarly, the things we do today, the technology we develop, the trends we follow will in someway or other set the base for the future generations. The waste we produce, the pollution that has been created has affected the environment constantly and negatively. There has been a decline in resources due to exploitation. This will affect the standard and quality of living of the future generations. They would have to live in a more polluted environment with a paucity of resources.
In conclusion, the way we live currently although might seem to be not influential, is in some way or the other continuously affecting and influencing the future generations negatively. What we do today sets a base on which the next generations will develop. We must take care about what we do today and think about how, it holistically affects the human cycle and take measures to combat the negative influences that we might inflict.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: DISCUSSIONS_AROUND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discussions about'?
Suggestion: discussions about
...ging our habits. There have been lot of discussions around whether our current way of life affects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93162393162 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86566846888 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8524542813 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.67857142857 5.45110844103 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282176639097 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784421034768 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776067211501 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187351078904 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336483885251 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.