Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than parents in the past.
As greater attention has been paid on education, the controversy that what role do parents play in children’s education has emerged, some contends that parents in the past with more energy and time were more involved in children’s education, while others jeopardize that parents participate more in children’s education. In my point of view, I’d like to agree with the later prospective for several reasons.
To begin with, the overall knowledge level of parents are higher now and that allows them to take part in children’s education. Specifically speaking, with the developing compulsory education system, an increasing number of parents with higher degree of education are capable of participating in children’s education, conversely large proportion of literacy before confirms the fact that people received less education in the past, not mention to be involved in children’s education. A recent online survey on Sina.com indicated that parents who are involved in children’s education has raised 25 percent during 15 years, this record literally reflects the fact that greater parents with the abilities to guide and teach children now are more inclined to participate in children’s education .
Furthermore, with the indispensable role of education plays in the whole society, intelligence-centered society prompts parents to pay more attention on children’s education than parents in the labour intensive society with large proportion of illiteracy. For the whole society increasingly value education, the more and more essential request of knowledge during working and daily lives render parents to follow this trend and to be involved in children’s education. Just think about the phenomenon that receiving education has been deem as the critical tasks for children gradually, while the public before generally regard as the exclusive opportunity for upper class of the society, meanwhile there were large number of illiterates among parents. Accordingly, it’s quite hard for most parents before to participate in children’s education.
Also, parents now are more ambitious to cultivate their children become somebody, and their big hopes encourage them intervene more in children’s education. With the higher status of education stays during society, parents with a wealth of experiences might perceive distinct seek for intelligent brain workers and tremendous demand on education, and the aware of importance of education lead parents to intervene more in children’s education. However, compared with parents now, the main hope of parents in the past was render their children to grow up with healthy bodies and mental. In this striking contrast, parents now are more likely to get involved in children’s education with the enormous hope for children’s promising future.
In a nutshell, parents are dramatically more involved in children’s education than before, not only because they possess higher general knowledge level, but also due to the social trend they are following and the ambitious hope on their children’s future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d to participate in children’s education . Furthermore, with the indispensable ...
^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deemed'.
Suggestion: deemed
...menon that receiving education has been deem as the critical tasks for children grad...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67602591793 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0598348288 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464362850972 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9839300195 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.714285714 100.406767564 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0714285714 20.6045352989 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527430457181 0.236089414692 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237976767194 0.076458572812 311% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111023691252 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365696223478 0.150856017488 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475851867783 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 11.7677419355 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 58.1214874552 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.1575268817 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.