Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
In today’s modern and sophisticated world, education is of paramount importance in children’s lives since it helps them achieve prosperity in their professional and personal lives. Being the closest people surrounding children, parents play a significant role in their educational affairs. With this in mind, some people believe that today’s children are more provided with the parents’ assistance to do homework; however, others hold the opposite side, stating that previous generations were more involved in children’s education than contemporary ones. I, personally, agree with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, the vast majority of people have high social awareness and are utterly aware of the positive effects of education on their children’s lives. To be more specific, over the last three decades, due to different information resources, such as mass media, newspaper, and instructive conferences, parents have got acquainted with the paramount importance of being educated. They know that their children’s professional future depends on how educated they are when they enter the workforce. For example, only rarely does an ill-equipped person is hired in well-paid jobs by employers since managers and supervisors are looking for educated personnel. Consequently, they exert themselves not only to encourage children to study more diligently but also to collaborate with them to accomplish homework and give them a helping hand in their education matters. By contrast, in the past, being oblivious about the advantages of education, parents were not inclined to aid children with their assignments, nor did they want them to go to school. In fact, most of the parents back then forced their children to work on their subsistence farms instead of stimulating them to go to school. Not only that, but they behaved education with disrespect and considered it as time-consuming work.
Secondly, parents are much more educated nowadays compared to previous generations, making them able to help their children in their study materials. To elucidate, these days, education is more convenient than it was in the past. In other words, people today have access to top-notch educational centers to become educated, resulting in a significantly high literacy rate in society. Needless to say, educated parents are qualified to assist children and get involved in their education. The more educated parents are, the more they are able to offer his helping hand to their children. On the other hand, previous parents were so illiterate that they were unable to have a just shallow understanding of textbooks. Statistics have shown that the rate of parent’s assistance in the children’s education has increased by more than sixty percent over the past two decades. This is compelling evidence to substantiate how helpful and supportive today’s parents are in the children’s learning process.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that parents in the past were involved in children’s education much less than current parents are. This is because not only people’s awareness has now increased in comparison with the past, but also a vast preponderance of parents have high university degrees, causing them to be able to help their kids.
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 95
- Do you agree or disagree Most experiences in our lives that seemed difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future 83
- Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...only rarely does an ill-equipped person is hired in well-paid jobs by employers si...
^^
Line 5, column 989, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... parents are in the children’s learning process. In conclusion, I am of the opinion...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44423076923 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00974194868 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501923076923 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 876.6 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0665391912 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.681818182 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.581036771215 0.236089414692 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196901508205 0.076458572812 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126980330821 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426281661901 0.150856017488 283% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112372940063 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.