Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice

Essay topics:

Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

In today's modern and sophisticated world, with advances in science and technology, traveling has become more popular among people due to its convenience compared to the past. In this line of thought, individuals, based on their personalities, have different attitudes towards their means of traveling. Some people are inclined to take a trip alone, and they believe that it is a more enjoyable journey; however, others hold the opposite side, preferring to have a companion during their vacation. I, personally, agree with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, being in the company of a friend makes it much easier to interact with local people during the travel. To be more specific, even though a lone traveler is extroverted, he or she may seem antisocial by local people living around. A couple, on the other hand, is usually considered not only more approachable but also far more friendly. My own experience is a compelling example to demonstrate this. Two years ago, my friend and I traveled to China as a summer vacation. Native people treated us with respect and hospitality, and we were welcome to homes and businesses with open arms. When I asked them about their kindness towards us, they mentioned that our noticeable cheerfulness and happiness were the significant grounds to motivate them to behave so kindly. In contrast, I took a trip to Turkey during the Christmas vacation last year. I tried to have a similar experience and to communicate with people there. Nevertheless, I was unable to establish a relationship, nor was I able to forge a simple contact with residents. This example substantiates that while a single traveler may be outgoing and kind, it can be challenging to identify from a far distance.

Second, traveling in a pair leads to a more economically advantageous trip in comparison with an alone one. To elucidate this point, nowadays, leisure travel is highly appealing to people, resulting in an astronomical rise in accommodation costs. In fact, over the last two decades, hotel managers and landlords have increased the price of rooms, especially during vacation times, which is the main budget drain and takes a financial toll on travelers. However, by vacationing with friends, individuals are capable of sharing the room and cutting the expenses considerably. In addition, if individuals travel along with a friend, other daily costs, including entrance fees, parking tickets, and preparing a meal, will be divided. For example, as I aforementioned above, visiting China with my friend two years ago, we rented an apartment and shared its cost, which was financially beneficial, and enabled us to save several hundred dollars. As a result of saving this money, we could change our plans and extend our trip for about one more week. This example demonstrates how financially beneficial traveling with a companion is.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the advantages of traveling with a partner outweigh the merits of a single vacation. This is because it is much more economically beneficial, and because being with a companion helps a traveler interact with local dwellers.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aborate in the following paragraphs. To begin with, being in the company of a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1150, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'identifying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: identifying
...utgoing and kind, it can be challenging to identify from a far distance. Second, tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enging to identify from a far distance. Second, traveling in a pair leads to a m...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2690.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14340344168 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99368872816 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554493307839 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1163507812 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.92 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259292955018 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729320625054 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553108836196 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164806847189 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191382625098 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.