Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
In today’s modern and sophisticated world, education is of paramount importance in children’s lives since it helps them achieve prosperity in their professional and personal lives in the future. Being the closest people surrounding children, parents play a significant role in their education affairs. With this in mind, some people believe that children today are more provided with the parent’s assistance to do homework; however, others hold the opposite side, stating that previous generations were more involved in children’s education that contemporary ones are. I, personally, agree with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, the vast majority of people have a high social awareness, and they are utterly aware of the positive effects of education on their children’s lives. To be more specific, over the last three decades, due to different information resources, such as mass media, newspaper, and instructive conferences, parents have got acquainted with the paramount importance of being educated. They know that professional future of their children are highly dependent on how educated they are when they enter the workforce. For example, only rarely does an ill-equipped person is hired in well-paid jobs by employers since managers and supervisors are looking for educated personnel. Consequently, they exert themselves not only to encourage children to study more diligently but also to collaborate with them to accomplish homework and give them a helping hand in their education matters. By contrast, in the past, being totally oblivious about the advantages of education, parents were not inclined to aid children with their assignment, nor did they want them to go to school. In fact, most of parents back then forced their children to work on their subsistence farms instead of stimulating them to go school. Not only that, but they behaved education with disrespect and considered it as a time-consuming work.
Secondly, parents are much more educated nowadays compared to previous generations, making them able to help their children in their study materials. To elucidate, these days, education is more convenient than it was in the past. In fact, people today have access to top-notch educational centers as to become educated, resulting in a significantly high literacy rate in society. Needless to say, educated parents are qualified to assist children and get involved in their education. On the other hand, previous parents were so illiterate that they were unable to have a just shallow understanding on textbooks. Statistic have shown that the rate of parent’s assistance in their children’s education has increased by more than sixty percent over the past two decades. This is compelling evidence to substantiate how helpful and supportive today’s parents are in children’s learning process.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that parents in the past were involved in children’s education much less that current parents are. This is because not only people’s awareness has now increased in comparison with the past, but also a great preponderance of parents have high university degrees, causing them be able to help their kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...only rarely does an ill-equipped person is hired in well-paid jobs by employers si...
^^
Line 3, column 1097, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the parents') or simply say ''most parents''.
Suggestion: most of the parents; most parents
...hey want them to go to school. In fact, most of parents back then forced their children to work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 883, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ay’s parents are in children’s learning process. In conclusion, I am of the opinion...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2768.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43811394892 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00986678399 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510805500982 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3141202273 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.80952381 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2380952381 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556295377894 0.236089414692 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186219308438 0.076458572812 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119035311929 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401348409242 0.150856017488 266% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113725724208 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.