People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one is the most useful?
A. plant trees and create parks
B. persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers
C. increase access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads
Protecting the natural environment is the crucial thing we need to do in modern society. Though the all three environmentally-improving movements offered in the prompt are important, in my opinion, increasing access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles is the vital one.
To begin with, people need transportation everyday, and increasing public transportation will surely reduce incredible pollution. In modern society, convenient transportation enables people to go any place they want that we cannot live without them. Since in many communities the public transportation is not accessible very much, almost every adult, not every family, owns a car. However, these huge numbers of automobiles produce pernicious pollution, harm our health ,and decrease the air quality. Thus, if communities can resolve to increase the public transportation, then people can decrease their dependence on their own cars which not only produce pollution but also cost much to maintain. This way, the pollution caused by this huge number of automobiles can reduce significantly.
Another reason that we are required to reduce the number of automobiles is that this policy protects the habitats of wild animals. In order to enable people to use these automobiles conveniently, we need a big amount of land to build not only roads but also parking lots. Thus, automobiles take lots of space which is used to be the home of many other species. If we reduce our private cars and take the public buses or trains or any kinds of public transportation, then there are fewer automobiles. As a result, we no longer need to expand the numbers of roads, parking lots, and even we can return some space back to wild animals.
The last but most important reason is that this big number of automobiles consume' crural oil tremendously which is the root resulting in global warming. We can reduce this kind of problem if we increase the access to public transportation. My city is a good example to illustrate this idea. Our new major increased the routes and the numbers of buses 50% and 10%, respectively. From that on, the amount of oil we consume in our city reduces 20% in one year. In other words, increasing public transportation is a useful strategy to slow the trend of global warming.
Admittedly, some people might argue that planting trees, creating parks, or persuading local shops to stop providing plastic bags are more important. However, with the reasons I mentioned above, I believe that increasing access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles is the crucial one that communities should do immediately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... begin with, people need transportation everyday, and increasing public transportation w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WANT_THAT_I[5]
Message: Did you mean 'want us to'?
Suggestion: want us to
...ion enables people to go any place they want that we cannot live without them. Since in many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce pernicious pollution, harm our health ,and decrease the air quality. Thus, if c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12125825348 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505827505828 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9632484226 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.80952381 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249883950251 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728529196023 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621126308414 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1586099125 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740761451689 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.