People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things; other people learn by reading about things; others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your choice.
People have been exploring things they are surrounded by since the beginning of the civilization. Scientists emit three possible ways of receiving information about something: reading, listening and doing it. I am absolutely convinced that the best option is practical learning due to the reasons mentioned hereinafter.
Firstly, while mastering something by themselves, people acquire an experience that is helpful in life. It means that one remembers information better by working with it rather than listening or reading about it. Moreover, one’s experience might be helpful to other people who are interested in the same area of life. For example, when I watched videos about quadcopter, I did not understand how to control it, but I understood it a minute after I bought one to myself. Thus, experiencing something by oneself is one of the best and most accurate source of various data.
There are those who maintain that the best options to study is listening to people’s opinions or reading their books, because they might be professionals. However, I disagree with these contentions because their opinions and researches might not be true. Many popular scientists are sponsored by dominating companies and their books or words might be not true. For example, one chocolate company bought an article from a famous scientist so that he proved that their chocolate is healthy, but it was not. Therefore, if one should be very careful when reading a book by a scientist sponsored by a company.
Finally, acting with something helps people to concentrate on one task and to practice muscle memory. It follows that people who are easy to disturb are able to practice their cluster. Furthermore, being focused on something is extremely important because it helps to reduce time and increase quality of work. For example, my father prefers fix everything by himself instead of calling a specialist and listen what he has to do. Hence, one should do something by oneself because by this one can concentrate on the mission.
All in all, in the essay above I have demonstrated the advantages of practical learning over reading and listening.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15759312321 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87723886053 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555873925501 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.0327025751 48.9658058833 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7368421053 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208506016982 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604910647777 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442029329063 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121379716253 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630260728097 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.