People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Learning is a continuous process, and we learn from multiple sources. Learning requires specialized knowledge which also depends on who is teaching. Learning from experienced person is easy compare to the person who does not have knowledge of teaching. I believe that people can learn better from supervisor or teachers. I will elaborate my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, in order to learn specialized knowledge, we need to learn it from the person who is an expert in that particular field. For example, subject like math can only be learned from an experienced teacher. One needs to have in-depth knowledge on the subject. In such case, my friends won't be able to help me due to lack of their expertise. They will be at the same level as me and so they can't help me to teach new things. Similarly, if I want to learn some new skills, I can only seek help of someone who knows and has used those skills. For example, I wanted to learn surf board. None of my friends know about it. Thus, I have to look for a help from person who is good at surfing.
Secondly, it is always better to take advise from the experience person. For example, when I take a new job, I won't be accustomed to the new environment. It may be possible that most employees in my division/group are newly hired. In such scenario, I can't expect my colleagues to help me to settle in new environment, but my supervisor will be able to help as he must have reach to this high post only after getting some experience in company. He will be able to help me with adjusting to a new office environment.
Let’s put in a nutshell, I strongly believe that individuals at a higher level can teach better because they have vast knowledge on many subjects, and they know better techniques for teaching through their experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires specialized" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'specializing' or 'to be specialized'.
Suggestion: specializing; to be specialized
...rom multiple sources. Learning requires specialized knowledge which also depends on who is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... which also depends on who is teaching. Learning from experienced person is easy compare...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...aching. I believe that people can learn better from supervisor or teachers. I will ela...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... be at the same level as me and so they cant help me to teach new things. Similarly,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 571, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to surf'
Suggestion: to surf
... skills. For example, I wanted to learn surf board. None of my friends know about it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...up are newly hired. In such scenario, I cant expect my colleagues to help me to sett...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59133126935 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.727591078 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501547987616 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.897807883 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.15 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208449341854 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639171856145 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548525657763 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129600209576 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535574972616 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.