people should stay with their old friends than making new friends. do you agree or disagree?
All relationships require work. They do not just materialize and maintain themselves, and they are not built on a foundation of convenience either. They take time and patience and two people who are willing to put in the effort. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether individuals should stay with their old friends or make new friends. However, the popular salient to which I vehemently cling is that people should try to find more new friends because it is more advantageous for people to improve their personality. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, our friends play a crucial role in our lives and being away from them could have deleterious effects on our relationships. Broadly speaking, there is nothing more vital to the bond we share with our friends than simply being there for them. Although old friends are familiar with our traits and characters, make new friends could help us view life differently and broaden our horizon extensively. As a tangible example, being friends with new people with different attitudes and passions will provide an opportunity for individuals not to view life intrinsically. The startling fact which flabbergasted me is that majorities of people are inclined toward the opinion that real friends are just old friends and hardly can people nowadays find a real man. To elucidate more on this issue, people need to be familiar with majorities of people in order to improve their personality and develop their view of life.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance is that new friends could have positive effects and provide fertile ground for people to mimic their behaviors. If we take a minute to ponder over it, in today's hectic city of life, many new friends carry various hallmarks like veracity, fidelity, shrewd, diligent, and trustful and so forth. So, these characteristics are inspiring and stir up people to imitate different positive behaviors. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that makes new friends not only can help us to become a self-sufficient person when it comes to different traits and features but also can help us enhance our social activities and socialize with various humans.
However, every coin has two sides. New friends might not be able to take place of older ones. Indeed, not only are old friends familiar with our characteristics but also are more likely to help us when we run into huge problems and face trials and tribulations. Arguably, make new friends need a lot of time to get informed of many behaviors and traits, so, there is no guarantee new friends be in the same boat with us. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal stance.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether individuals should stay with their old ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, as to, broadly speaking
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2448.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77187190269 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502032520325 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8564901773 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77272727273 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345530866777 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949957091276 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819511566389 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17639479057 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104161708953 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.