People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human's modern society, people more and more tend to increase the level of their literacy. Actually, no one can turn a blind eye to the profound effects of being knowledgeable and being skillful in a person's future. A simple recognition of this argument lends our discussion to the questions of whether people expand their knowledge in one field or more than one field. Although some people adhere to this belief that having different skills lead to extraordinary future, in my vantage point, they should raise their skills in only one field since they can find decent job, and also strengthen their efficiency.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to concentrate on just one skill is finding a proper occupation in future. It is absolutely undeniable that at 20th and 21st centuries with the improvement of technology and galloping rate of science, jobs are being specialized and sophisticated so much so that everyone in charge of a particular job should enjoy a great amount of experiences in one field. That is why employees need to focus on just field. To illustrate more, take a case of a computer engineer who improves his skills in programming for instance. It is axiomatic that he can solve every problems in an incredibly ingenious way. Hence, every reputed companies try to stimulate him in order to hire him in its company by offering high salary.
The further subtle point is that increasing a person's productivity can be considered another advantage of focusing on one field. As a matter of fact, technology nowadays drastically improved so nobody can enrich his knowledge in varied fields. Without a shadow of doubt, if a person just improve his skills in one field, not only can he enrich his skills efficiently, but also he can broaden his horizon. On the other hand, a person who tries to enhance his skills in varied subjects will overwhelmed by stress and he surely cannot handle all materials effectively.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned details and points, it is crystal-clear that improving skills in just one skill can be highly beneficial because people can find a proper job, and also improve their productivity. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that a person by having various skills in different fields can make headway in his life. Have you ever seen a person who find a decent job without having deep knowledge in one field? Can you considered a successful person without having deep knowledge? I absolutely believe no!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ne skill is finding a proper occupation in future. It is absolutely undeniable that at 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rther subtle point is that increasing a persons productivity can be considered another ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'overwhelm'
Suggestion: overwhelm
...ance his skills in varied subjects will overwhelmed by stress and he surely cannot handle a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'for instance', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231422505308 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.146496815287 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0806794055202 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0530785562633 0.046263068375 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0658174097665 0.0685040099705 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138004246285 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0467091295117 0.0351676179071 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82300100321 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0276008492569 0.0309702414327 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00212314225053 0.00188951952338 112% => OK
Determiners: 0.0891719745223 0.0887237588012 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031847133758 0.0209618222197 152% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106157112527 0.0139019557991 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2560.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 434.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89861751152 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384792626728 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244239631336 0.251872472559 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177419354839 0.174417080927 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13133640553 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82300100321 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 61.0710699589 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8421052632 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.145303774 48.84282405 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.736842105 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 47.2660683968 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.568 1.45489161554 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152465243148 0.300154397459 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120903616462 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108310579271 0.0752933317313 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484518020364 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128879264834 0.151897553556 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552231403187 0.114077575197 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461793054167 0.0781384742642 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366335812974 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0265835759345 0.067059652881 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105726375139 0.210909579961 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284363269122 0.0618886996521 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.