A person should never make an important decision alone. Do you agree or dis agree with this statement? Use specific example and detail in your answer.
I disagree with the statement that a person should never make an important decision alone. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that people should seek help whenever they can to make the right decisions, for example by getting more information about the issue on hand from other friends or relatives who have more experience and more knowledge. In other words, two brains or more are, with no doubt, better than one and co-operation in the process of decision making is lauded and praised across the board. Yes, this idea does not deviate much away from my view. However, we cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that helping hands are not often available and voices that could save us from committing fatal mistakes might be far away at a certain moment. As a result, we should sometimes be ready to choose our path ourselves. Some occupations require employees to make critical decisions on their own. For instance, police officers may need to take immediate action when they see a crime or someone breaking the law. Besides, students ought to figure out what university or college they are looking to attend.
Moreover, if we relied on others to move forward and waited until they step in to help us, we would never become independent. what's more, we might blame other people if things went terribly wrong. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. When I was about to make a crucial decision in my life to select my major area of study and, in turn, my future career, I tried to discuss my thoughts with my family. Unsurprisingly, they were delighted to share their point of view and to help me come up with the most appropriate choice. Their recommendation was that I should enroll in medical school since they were convinced that this would ensure the best financial and social status for me. Although I wanted to pursue a career in computer science, I listened to them and joined the medical field. After graduation, I found myself not intrigued by this profession and I regretted that I did not depend on my own intuition to determine my upcoming future. No matter how I try to avoid putting blame on them, I come back to the conclusion that they played a role in alluring me to do that and ruined my career.
To sum up, the statement that important decisions should never be made alone does not ring true to me. This is because oftentimes we have to make our own decisions without any help and asking for help could lead us to blame others for our own failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whats
... us, we would never become independent. whats more, we might blame other people if th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... us, we would never become independent. whats more, we might blame other people if th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing me to do that and ruined my career. To sum up, the statement that important ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us to blame others for our own failure.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i feel, i mean, no doubt, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63793103448 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49137092082 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571120689655 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5124119368 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.476190476 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1967801101 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618122252149 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998288814011 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161001481936 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937371983248 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.