Providing Internet access is as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
A controversial issue relating to whether the government should provide Internet access with both citizens with no cost since Internet access is just as important as other services has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that governments should not charge no fee of the web to residents. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, if the administration supplies Internet access to every person with no money, which signifies that they would not have enough funds to support other services of the country. To be more specific, the comprehensive development of contemporary society includes a number of aspects, such as building railways, expanding markets, improving citizens' salaries. In this case, if governments put plenty of money into the construction of the Internet access and offer to each individual for free, they would not be able to possess extra funds to construct other facilities of the community. As a result, this policy would not benefit the progress of the whole nation and the residents may not live in a better environment compared to before. On the contrary, if the leader of the state could distribute some money to the sides related to people's lives rather than only improving Internet access with no expenditure, the families would get more convenience and satisfactory from other aspects of living environments and ignore feeling of uncomfortable for the fee that needs to pay for internet access.
In addition, providing Internet access without charge would cause a lot of severe issues in the society. The students would spend lots of time on computers instead of studying hard since the web is free of charge and there are too much contents on internet that would make an immature person addicted. After a long period of time, grades of youngsters would drop down quickly. Numerous adults may also take a long time to surf the net and even use it mistakenly. For example, they may find some contents related to crime, drugs and sex on the Internet as well as play some attractive online games all day. Under these circumstances, they would not devote much time to work or company with family members. Moreover, this behavior would also damage their mental and physical health. Therefore, the administration should not open Internet access to the public for free.
Finally, individuals should use the web reasonably if the government offers them without any charge. All the efforts of the country are to make the residents' lives more comfortable and convenient. Hence, the public should use the Internet more effectively and do not waste the leader's endeavors.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, the nation should not supply the citizens’ Internet at no cost since they may not have enough capacity to support other services of the city and both the young teenagers or adults may be addicted to the web completely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 843, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...bute some money to the sides related to peoples lives rather than only improving Intern...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...web is free of charge and there are too much contents on internet that would make an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... immature person addicted. After a long period of time, grades of youngsters would drop down q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2474.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03869653768 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72902240136 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513238289206 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.154025175 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375443318218 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102823642678 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102863522472 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213186552375 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862172038623 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.