Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leadership skills are somehow controversial. Some people believe that leaders are born leaders. However, other people holds that the abilities to be a successful leader could be taught. In my opinion, I disagree with the position that managing skills only comes naturally and cannot be gained. I contend that Although some individuals are biologically gifted to be leaders, they definitely need to improve these talents through experience and knowledge.
First and foremost, no one is born with the complete set of know-hows that are required for guiding others. This is mainly due to the fact that mastering many skills is required to be a great leader. Some people are born with a charismatic personality but their problem-solving and judgement capacities need some development. Other people are naturally determined and have a fascinating competence to get things done. Nevertheless, their character is not appealing to wide variety of individuals. Hence, most people are talented with some leadership skills but need to work hard to gain other demanded skills. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. I never thought of myself as a leader. Conversely, when I got a job as a store manager where I had to supervise other staff members, I realized I had some skills that enabled me to do well on that post. For instance, I discovered that I am a good listener and I seldom practice a rule of authority on others, which, in fact, made people more comfortable working with me. Unfortunately, my communication skills called for more attention. Consequently, I started taking communication skills courses, which had an enormous effect on my performance on the job.
Secondly, learning to be a leader could be achieved through experience and knowledge. Each process could be broken down into smaller steps. The ability to tackle certain problems could be accomplished through knowing the right sequence of decisions that are supposed to be taken to reach a resolution. To clarify, in my previous example, I doubted my ability to encourage and support people. As soon as I began to focus on what to do and when to do it to hone this skill, I was able to offer enough positive spirit for my subordinates. To illustrate, I found that complimenting associates when they come back to work after a vacation makes a huge difference as they become more efficient and eager to work harder. For all the aforementioned reasons, leadership skills could be attained through training and exposure.
In summation, I reject the idea that leadership is only a divinely given trait, but indeed it's a reward for hard work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...only a divinely given trait, but indeed its a reward for hard work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i mean, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05977011494 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02971586572 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542528735632 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.272074692 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.04 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162983066988 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475360492466 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407387722013 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991158418393 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494175375713 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.