rococo style in art and architecture
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the rococo style popularity decline in the nineteenth century. While the reading state s that the although rococo was a predominant style until the nineteenth century, it,s significance was declined gradually. The lecture refutes this, saying that although it is true the test missing the significant changes.
First of all, the reading climes rococo style was restricted to work only for wealthy people buildings such as mansions and palaces. However, the lecture argues that although it is true, it is overstated. She illustrated that the rococo style also worked for the small communities like churches and other communities.
In addition to that, the reading makes the argument that the style was the failure to explore the significant subject matters in their design. The lecture counters this point by stating they explore the real-life sophisticated issues. She explained this point using the design of the park as an example.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the artistic style was expensive especially the illusion. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out they were the pioneer in the advancing of their style. She mentioned that they were innovative in the implementation of new styles in the early age.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- What will your friend like and not like when visiting your hometown? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the rococo style popularity decline in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...t style until the nineteenth century, it,s significance was declined gradually. Th...
^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntation of new styles in the early age.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 206.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28155339806 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68556746308 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 212.727598566 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 618.680645161 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0999077914 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203610449535 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807097969758 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661709477923 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129712744867 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539002193153 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.