Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning.
In modern life, children are often busy for their studies, and after they finish their works, most of them will want to relax and play. Some people may say that children should spend more time playing and studying, while others prefer they should be required to help the family with household chores. In my opinion, I prefer the latter option.
To begin with, if children help their family to do house works, they can learn some lessons that they cannot learn at school. To be more specific, doing chores at home can count as an outside education. Parents can teach their kids all sorts of lesson. Take myself as an example, I often help my family do many house chores, such as washing dishes or cleaning the floor. The basic thing that I can learn is of course the process of doing these works. Moreover, since I have two brothers, we need to assign who should do which job. However, we often have the preference of doing something, so we need to learn how to communicated with each other and figure out the solution to prevent some unnecessary arguments. During the process, we can not only learn how to do these chores, but also improve our communication skills. As a result, we can never learn these skills at school, so I think it is important to required children doing house works at home.
In addition, children can discover some hobbies when they are doing house works. When children are doing house works, they might find out something they are extremely interested in, and become their job in the future. For instance, my brother usually help my mom when she is cooking. He can learn how to cook some tasty dishes, and some other techniques about cooking. As time pass, his cooking become better and better. Eventually, he choose to become a cook for his future career. Thus, children can find out some of their interests while doing house works, and this will definitely help them in their future career. As a result, parents should ask their children to do house chores at home.
Last but not least, doing house chores can strength the relationship between parents and children. In modern time, people are often busy for rather works or studies. so they seldom have time to interact with their family. When they are doing house chores together, they can have the chance to communicate with each others. They can talk about what happen in their life and if children are having some problems, parents can discuss with them and figure out a solution. Moreover, parents can have a better understanding of their kids. Thus, it is important to have a strong relationship between parent and children. Indeed, by requiring children to do chores at home can strength the family's relationship.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that it is better for children to play and study because children at this age should focus on their studies. When they are tired, playing is a way for them to release stress. However, I think that children can also learn a lot and release stress when they are doing house work. Thus, children should be required to do house chores in their family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...ecome better and better. Eventually, he choose to become a cook for his future career....
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...often busy for rather works or studies. so they seldom have time to interact with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 9.8082437276 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71985157699 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33076403621 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417439703154 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3821630336 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.84375 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78125 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266522714865 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824426453861 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096602049159 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205193013458 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114524348034 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.