In today's societies, the question of whether governments must maintain their historic building or replace them with new and modern structures has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various types of responses to this topic based on their social, cultural, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I'm concerned, I believe that city should preserve its historic places for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing comes to mind right off the bat is that the old buildings are an integral part of a city's or a country's history. In fact, these kinds of places are evidence of social and cultural aspects of cities. By protecting these historical places, the governments can show their previous cultures to their juvenile. Although information about a historical aspect of each country is available in their books, these visible things have more effect on people's mind. Let's make a brief explanation about that. For instance, whenever I am passing of the old building in my city belonging to the 500 years ago, I stop in front of it and pay attention to its construction style. It is so amazing that how in those days people can paint an analogous beautiful painting in each of its bricks. Therefore, this building can have a remarkable impact on new generation people.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that these old building can be used as means of attracting tourist. Each year, a plenty of interested people travel to varied places throughout the world to see these historical places. Accordingly, Government can make considerable money from historical and old structures by just spending little money for its maintenance. Let me shed a light on my point. Based on the statistics that were published by the experts the Greeks income from their tourist constitute about twenty percent of Its government revenues. Hence, this old building may have a potential to become a famous place for tourist and provide a lot of money for its city.
In conclusion, there are a plenty of reasons to show that protection of historical building has numerous advantages. Not only it helps people to have a more clear image from their past culture but also it provides an opportunity to attain some money from its tourist. Consequently, it is imperative that government maintain these buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In todays societies, the question of whether governments must maintain their histori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amilial backgrounds. However, as far as Im concerned, I believe that city should p...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...hings have more effect on peoples mind. Lets make a brief explanation about that. Fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04987531172 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81421418761 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551122194514 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0155923438 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24210295804 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068513221358 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703451226271 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15489947545 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619536285317 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.