Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Public transportation is a one of the very important aspects of a modern city. It is essential critical in large cities and millions of population use it in huge cities like New York, Tokyo and etc. Germane to this fact, a question that is matter of debate, a controversial one, is whether governments should improve public transportation or build more highways. I think governments should spend more money on improving public transportation rather than improving roads and highways because of three main reasons. Although building highways has a matter of importance as well, opposing the prevailing view, I'm personally on the belief that governments should spend more money on improving public transportation and the importance of the former takes precedence over that of the latter.
One compelling reason deserving to be mentioned is that First, it can help the environment and reduce air pollution. As you know one of the most challenging problems that major cities are faces is air pollution. A vivid example will shed more light on this issue For example, in Tehran, my home city, the air is always polluted and unclear. As the reports say, many people die because of heart diseases and cancer, and air pollution has a major role key in such cases. I think if a city like Tehran has an advanced and comfortable public transportation, more people would will be encouraged to use it, since it is cheaper and can save them money. This will lead to less usage of personal cars and it can will contribute a lot to air cleanliness.
Another point substantiating my stance which is equally important, if not more, is that Second, it can reduce traffic. Traffic in huge cities has have become a big problem that affects people psychologically and improving public transportation can make it better. Furthermore, When you are in hurry to get to your work or an important deal, being trapped in traffic is really annoying. For instance, I remember that once I was going for a job interview and I was late already, and the traffic caused me to arrive to the office even later. The amount of stress I had in that was somewhat something that I cannot put it in words. I think with a proper transportation system, there will be less traffic and so people's life will get better and healthier. Moreover, Furthermore the cities will be less crowded and look more beautiful.
Third, if governments spend money on public transportation, everyone would benefit from it. Conversely improving roads and highways will be more beneficial for those who tend to use their private vehicles a lot and this doesn't seem just enough. So, I think with a proper public transportation everyone would benefit. Those prefering to use public transportation will have more convenient trips, those who prefer to use private vehicles will enjoy less traffic, and even more those prefering to walk or bicycle can enjoy pretty less crowded streets.
To recapitulate In sum I think spending money on public transportation is a kind of investment that can solve many problems and surely the money spent on it will not be wasted. In the end I want to indicate that the reasons I provided don't mean the governments should spend nothing on highways and road, since it will have a lot of advantages too. But I think there should be a kind of planning for the governments' budget and it seems wiser to spend more on public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... it in huge cities like New York, Tokyo and etc. Germane to this fact, a question that i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... as well, opposing the prevailing view, Im personally on the belief that governmen...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e environment and reduce air pollution. As you know one of the most challenging pr...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...uce traffic. Traffic in huge cities has have become a big problem that affects peopl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...tation, everyone would benefit from it. Conversely improving roads and highways will be mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e their private vehicles a lot and this doesnt seem just enough. So, I think with a pr...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to indicate that the reasons I provided dont mean the governments should spend nothi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, really, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 9.8082437276 285% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 579.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88946459413 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91040266131 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46804835924 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.0 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1430124721 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.24 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.16 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342253647117 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102596117896 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112829661274 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217294291527 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140452470928 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.