Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Government should spend money on either improving roads and highways and transportation such as buses, subways. However, In my point of view, I believe that it is better to devote more budget to improving public transportation. There are several reasons why I contend that. First, It encourage people to use more public transportation and also help to decrease and prevent air pollution. Most of all, some people don’t have enough money to own a car so they can use transportation better.
First and foremost, by improving and expanding public transportation people encourage to use public transportation rather than their own car. If there are considerable and improved, people could use Public transportation in the easier way and feel comfortable when they are going to work or other places. This result in not only comfort of citezens but also prevent air pollution as the amount of personal cars would lower. For example, Imagine that in your hometown, government want to equip the subways with the internet for very lower price or free, and since some people are interested to serve in internet for checking their email or for other purposes, they would be encouraged to use public transportation to serve at the internet. As you can see, by improving public transportation it would lead to prevent air pollution and encourage passengers.
Next, with spending money on improvement in public transportation, poor people can also benefit. There are some people that they can’t make an afford to buy a car. Also they may have problem and difficulty in arriving to the work since there aren’t good transportation or enough vehicle. Therefore improved buses and subways lead that impoverished people can use and benefit. For instance, in our city there were a few buses and this makes poor people like me some difficulties. I had to wait in bus station about 20 mintue to come but when the bus arrived It was full of passengers and all time I was late and I didn’t able to go to university on time. But now our government expand buses for using in public transportation. So It is clear that by improving and increasing buses and subways poor people also benefit from it.
In the end, there are many advantages in developing our city with spending more money on road and public transportation. However, I believe that the advantages of increasing budget on public transportation outweigh to the expanding money on road improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...l reasons why I contend that. First, It encourage people to use more public transportatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
... public transportation people encourage to use public transportation rather than their...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e some people that they can't make an afford to buy a car. Also they may have proble...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...can't make an afford to buy a car. Also they may have problem and difficulty in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... good transportation or enough vehicle. Therefore improved buses and subways lead that im...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03685503686 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03415431384 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474201474201 0.524837075471 90% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3380492707 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331451600984 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11379301859 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112057686811 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237108687375 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113052716872 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.