Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Transportation is very crucial to today society. Our economy heavily depends on transportation, our modern lifestyle relies on it and so forth. There was always a huge debate about which type of transportation is better and the government should support it more. Actually, this is a local decision and it depends on the local factors. But from my view, the better type of transportation is highways and roads and the government should fund them more than other types. In the following paragraphs, I will explain my reasons.
First, Highways are very effective in increasing economic growth. One of the major factors in GDP in every country is commercial activities such as imports and exports, even though trades inside the country, and this isn't possible without proper roads and highways. Recently one study conducted by EU, which measured the impacts of funding infrastructure like highways, found that every one billion investment in highways increases almost 7 billion in GDP in the next 10 years. Also, it is obvious that through history we can't find any prosperous country with weak transportation tools like roads. It's clear that roads and highways play a very important role in developing the economy in every country.
The second reason is that roads are a vital part of going trip and journeys. Today, almost every used to go on the trip on holidays or even on weekends. Also, many people use their own car to go trip, which depends on the roads and highways. With good highways, people will have a great time in their vacations and their time won't be wasted in traffic. I remember that first year I came to Tehran to go to the Tehran university there was a lot of traffic at Meydan Daneshgah square, and it took a lot of time to go home. Also, the Tehran-Karaj highways weren't complete. But after two years mayor constructed a bridge on Meydan Daneshgah square, and after 3 years the Tehran-Karaj highway completed. As a result, now there is less traffic in Meydan Daneshgah square, also many people use Tehran-Karaj highway to go to vacations easily and they enjoy more from their trip to the north of Iran. So the roads could increase the happiness of life for many people and although save a lot of time for them.
It is undeniable that transportation is very vital in human life. In my perspective, the best type of transportation is roads and highways, and the government should support them and fund them more. These supports will result in increased economic growth and enjoyment of life for many people. That's why everyone should support building new roads and highways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ugh trades inside the country, and this isnt possible without proper roads and highw...
^^^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., it is obvious that through history we cant find any prosperous country with weak t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...o home. Also, the Tehran-Karaj highways werent complete. But after two years mayor con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... and enjoyment of life for many people. Thats why everyone should support building ne...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86877828054 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74180516207 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493212669683 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0675832036 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164171061849 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505240211749 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670484856639 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116029292744 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660008322122 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.