Should nuclear power plants be banned?
Many nations ceased building nuclear weapons after World War II, and people realized how deadly they were. Nuclear power facilities exploded in a few nations as well. Nuclear power facilities, in my opinion, should be phased down as quickly as feasible. I feel this way for three reasons, which I shall discuss in further detail in the next article.
To begin with, nuclear power plants pose a threat to our planet's survival. Nuclear elements are extremely damaging to human health and natural species, and if we employ them incorrectly, our world will perish soon. As a result, a huge percentage of people oppose nuclear power facilities. In 2009, for example, nuclear power facilities in Japan exploded. People who resided there were forced to relocate, and several perished as a result. Then people became aware of the danger.
Second, a large number of countries have begun to use renewable energy sources. Renewable energy is beneficial to both humans and environment, and it can help us renew our world. So many scientists have created a huge amount of technology to produce renewable energy, and we have a responsibility to heal our world, so many scientists have invented a large quantity of technology to produce renewable energy. Some argue that switching entirely to renewable energy from restricted sources will take a long time, but I believe we should embrace new technologies and use renewable energy instead of limited energy.
Last but not least, renewable energy is less expensive than conventional energy. Renewable energy is created by utilizing natural resources like wind and water. The first cost, which includes facilities and installation, is high. On the contrary, utilizing minimal energy for a long time is more expensive in the long term. As a result, many homeowners are now installing solar panels on their roofs.
Finally, people's consciousness, which has existed throughout human history, as well as our responsibility for our acts, are the pistons that alter energy sources. Furthermore, the price is less than that of a standard one. As a result, I am certain that nuclear power facilities should be prohibited.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...le became aware of the danger. Second, a large number of countries have begun to use renewable e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, well, for example, i feel, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18103448276 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79794026831 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6515050941 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9545454545 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214882807884 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743574400323 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115990634676 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132842582941 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104633359939 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...le became aware of the danger. Second, a large number of countries have begun to use renewable e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, well, for example, i feel, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18103448276 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79794026831 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6515050941 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9545454545 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214882807884 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743574400323 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115990634676 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132842582941 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104633359939 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.