SOLAR ENERGY
The reading and the lecture are both about solar energy. The author of the reading claims that solar energy provides three benefits to the entire world: solar energy will end our dependence on fossil fuels, it is non-pollutant, and the solar panel does not need constant supervision as it has a long life span, giving us positive benefits. Moreover, the lecturer states that solar energy has another value such as offs production, multifaceted uses, and financial benefits. These benefits will improve life for everyone who acquired the panel to produce solar energy.
Firstly, according to the reading, solar energy can become the first permanent non-renewable source of energy, and without fear of overproduction. However, the lecturer disputes this point. The lecture claims that to gain solar panels it is necessary to use fossil fuel energy. In other words, we will make a lot of pollution but it will be worth it. Thus, in five years, a solar panel would be producing more energy than the energy we used to make it and with a longer life span. Once the solar panels are built we will use fewer fossil fuels giving us chances for better days.
Secondly, the reading states that the difference between solar and fossil energy is huge and beneficial. Solar energy has a low cost, is clean and renewable and it is a one time purchase. (Finally,) it would be beneficial for the planet since the solar panel lasts over 30 years without creating harm to the existing world. On the contrary, fossil energy is known for creating deadly pollution. Nevertheless, the lecture pointed out that solar energy can be controlled by the people who have installed solar panels. Finally, if a solar panel produces more energy than the person needs it can be sold to energy companies.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecture both discuss solar and fossil energy, and provide great points to consider that solar energy is beneficial and healthy for our living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... beneficial and healthy for our living.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9452887538 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50911071671 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504559270517 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.755373112 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7058823529 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57623496809 0.236089414692 244% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232039413672 0.076458572812 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138986161823 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424015973144 0.150856017488 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940358009652 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.