Solving environmental problems is the best way for the government to improve public health.
In today’s world, environmental issues are one of the most important and controversial issues. Our planet is in danger because Earth is becoming increasingly polluted more and more every day. Although the vast majority of society may have the view that government should invest in other things- such as entertainment activities or recreational facilities- to increase public health instead of preserving the environment, I, as an environmentalist, hold the view that they should invest to solve the environmental problems such as air pollution. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint in three reasons.
In the beginning, according to the many recent studies, air pollution can increase the many fatal disease rate such as lung cancer, it also extraordinarily harmful for pregnant women. every year many people die because of this environmental problem. The government needs to address this issue to decrease the rate of death and enhance public health. For example, in many developed countries such as European countries, the rate of air pollution is very low because governments have wide invested in smart transportation or renewable energies such as hydropower or solar power, these investments could increase the public health
Secondly, in recent decades humans produced many wastes because of industrialization. The culture of consumerism is another cause of producing waste, when things are broken, people prefer to buy another one and throw it away instead of repair it. This can put pressure on our nature and natural resources, trash in the environment can put many animal lives in danger. And extinct many rare types of wildlife. For instance, recent studies have conducted on Australian shores, have shown that the coral reef in Australia is in danger of extinction. So, these are could also pose a threat to human life
Thirdly, another reason that comes to mind is, by investing in smart transportation such as bicycles or bike-sharing, instead of decreasing fumes which cars are producing, the government could be able to encourage society to do walking and biking, these activities also profitable for their health. Because, according to the scientist, doing work out every day and regularly can decrease the hormone of stress, Cortisol, so they will be happier in their life.
In conclusion, as I mentioned above, the government should consider environmental issues to ease them and improve the public health and quality of life of their citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the environment I as an environmentalist hold the view that they should invest to...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orate on my viewpoint in three reasons In the beginning according to the many r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments could increase the public health Secondly in recent decades humans produc...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could also pose a threat to human life Thirdly another reason that comes to min...
^^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol so they will be happier in their life In conclusion as I mentioned above the g...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18829516539 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92263084738 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513994910941 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 393.0 20.1344086022 1952% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2039.0 100.406767564 2031% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 393.0 20.6045352989 1907% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 102.0 5.45110844103 1871% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 11.8709677419 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213598749477 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213598749477 0.076458572812 279% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131429457036 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805167566957 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 199.5 11.7677419355 1695% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -335.88 58.1214874552 -578% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 157.7 10.1575268817 1553% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.3 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.99 8.01818996416 337% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 10.002688172 630% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 159.2 10.0537634409 1583% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 10.247311828 615% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.