Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can damage our relationships with them.
With the development of modern society, people are trying to chase their dreams by going to college or find job in different cities around the country, which may leads to some distance between two close people. The method of keeping in touch is always a hot-debated one, with a majority of people hold that it is better to keep the distance. However, I believe one spend as much time as possible companying his beloved ones for the following reasons.
First and foremost, you are likely to develop a habit to keep in close touch with each other by regularly spending much time having fun with them. As is known to all, the more you stay with someone you like, the more you think of him even he is not around. This is because the huge amount of time you meet leads to your awareness of you are close, thus wanting to connect him from time to time, seeming like a good circle. On the contrary, if both or all of you keep silent and speak nothing with regards to a date or reunion, the concept of getting together will be decentagrated gradually, finally causes the collapse of a relationship you once valued.
Another point worth mentioning is that spending much quality time together enables people to communicate more frequently, which will to beneficial to their relationship. To state it more concisely, having face-to-face communication actively is the most effective and pragmatic way of maintaining a relationship, as you can turely truly feel the inner feelings of other people directly. For instance, me and my best friend went to different colleges in my city. Although there is great distance between our colleges, we made it a rule to hang out every two weeks in order to understand each other's current situations and interial feelings state of mind in time, which clearly shows the importance we attach on our friendship. Therefore, while not being in the same school, we successfully strengthened our friendship as time going by.
Admittedly, modern technology has brought enormous convenience to us, enabling us to text or call someone whenever we want. Nevertheless, a solid relationship is never built in this way, since you cannot even give them a hug or comfront confront them, looking into their tearing eyes when they are frustrated. To put it into a nutshell, individuals are well-advised to seize every opportunity to spend time with their close ones, since this is key to a long-lasting relationship.
- Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 70
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Teachers should give primary children aged5 10 assignments less than 30minutes because they have enough instructions in regular school classes Do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement There is never a good reason to be impolite rude to other people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loved ones for the following reasons. First and foremost, you are likely to de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89346246973 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80860607614 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585956416465 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5463114318 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.733333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207354089532 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675550737706 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377769730327 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117646693754 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623057560272 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.