Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
We now live in a world where communication has become much easier than it was before when there was no smartphones and no internets. With the arrival of smartphones the entire definition of technological advancement has changed and now smartphones are integral part of our lives. As there are both bad and good effects of every invention, similarly smartphones do have their drawbacks, and should not be used before reaching a certain age. So, young children should not be allowed to use smartphones before reaching that age when they would be able to understand the bad sides of smartphone and would be able to keep themselves safe from those.
In order to have a proper growth a child should mix with other children, play in the field, and go to school to acquire knowledge. Allowing smartphones inhibits the growth of a child because using them makes a child isolate from other children. There are thousands of mobile games which attract the children, for instance, as they are very fun to play. Playing them means children are not playing in the field which is very essential to the physical growth. Moreover, the mental growths of the children are also frustrated because playing mobile games do not help them to make friendship with other children, and those friendship of early childhood are essential for the healthy mental growth of a child. So, using smartphones at an early age hampers the growth of a child.
Besides, obstructing growth smartphones have many adult things which are not suitable for a child, and hence children should not be allowed to get their access to smartphones before reaching adulthood. For example, youtube has many educational videos which are helpful for children. But those videos can lead a child to adult videos as those videos are very attracting and exist everywhere in the internet. Having an access to those videos will attack a child mentally as well as physically so it is better not to provide children access to smartphones until they reach adulthood.
Finally, smartphones blocks communication between people. As we are getting more dependent on smartphone, we used to waste our time by using them and do not give our concentration to the people besides us. Children are the most sufferer as no communication with other people blocks their ability to speak and there are many cases where it has been found out that children are not able to speak properly as they were allowed to use smartphones at their early age.
Smartphones, without any doubt, have
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this friendship' or 'those friendships'?
Suggestion: this friendship; those friendships
...ake friendship with other children, and those friendship of early childhood are essential for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...xist everywhere in the internet. Having an access to those videos will attack a child men...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, hence, moreover, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95260663507 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71365402198 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457345971564 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6376921165 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138840139621 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511875236662 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040528887981 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697411198199 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438655174519 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.