Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important * gtools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of giving a smartphone to a child. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely agree that giving a smartphone to a child is better than not giving. It is my firm belief that a child that has a smartphone is more sociable and clever, for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, a child who have a smartphone, can search a lot of things, for a school assignment or a curiosity that them have, and making this, they would became more smart, and would acquire more knowledge. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, when I was younger, 6 years old, I could only TV shows, nowadays, the children, can see what they want, where then want. For this reason, I believe that giving a child a smartphone is a smart thing to do.
Secondly, I believe that they became more sociable, because, let’s use the example above, if a child see a YouTube channel that is about math, he or she, can debate in the classroom with the teacher about new ways to solve a problem, and then, the child can also help him or her classmates. Drawing for my personal experience, I was very bad in learning English, but, I started to search a lot, on blogs, websites, and even in YouTube, I could learn in one mouth what I learned in 1 year in a particular School. It’s certainly clear to see why I think that giving a smartphone to a child is better rather than not giving.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. First of all, a child who have a smartph...
^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... them have, and making this, they would became more smart, and would acquire more know...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38062283737 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56385740292 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7482548781 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968506249615 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437730924013 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352180635583 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653430969487 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327890216327 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.