Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important * gtools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of giving a smartphone to a child. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely agree that giving a smartphone to a child is better than not giving. It is my firm belief that a child that has a smartphone is more sociable and clever, for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, a child who have a smartphone, can search a lot of things, for a school assignment or a curiosity that them have, and making this, they would became more smart, and would acquire more knowledge. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, when I was younger, 6 years old, I could only TV shows, nowadays, the children, can see what they want, where then want. For this reason, I believe that giving a child a smartphone is a smart thing to do.
Secondly, I believe that they became more sociable, because, let’s use the example above, if a child see a YouTube channel that is about math, he or she, can debate in the classroom with the teacher about new ways to solve a problem, and then, the child can also help him or her classmates. Drawing for my personal experience, I was very bad in learning English, but, I started to search a lot, on blogs, websites, and even in YouTube, I could learn in one mouth what I learned in 1 year in a particular School. It’s certainly clear to see why I think that giving a smartphone to a child is better rather than not giving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Jasman23 | 40 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | kk_kk | 66 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important gtools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The Internet causes people to interact with each other less than they did in the past Use specific reasons to support your answers 60
- Do you agree or desagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 60
- Some people think that family is the most important influence on young adults Other people think that friends are the most important influence in young adults Which view do you agree with Use examples to support your position 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. First of all, a child who have a smartph...
^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... them have, and making this, they would became more smart, and would acquire more know...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38062283737 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56385740292 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7482548781 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968506249615 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437730924013 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352180635583 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653430969487 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327890216327 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.