Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Technology, these days is part and parcel of one's life. Blanket ban or free access to smart phones, either of these options are wrong. I would prefer to give access to smart phones to children under proper parents vigilance.
Smart phones with internet provide free access to ample of free educational videos to kids. They can gather information on latest developments across the globe which otherwise would not be possible, as the recent photos of the universe from James hubble telescope is all over the internet.Therefore children can have access to these photos on their own and even can share with their friends via whatsapp groups.
Other than educational information, Parents can get live location of their kids 24/7 through various application provided in the smart phones, as due to professional commitments parents can never spend whole day with thier kids.However, through smart phones they can communicate with their kids anytime and anywhere. Moreover kids can also feel safe with access to smart phones, as parents will be one phone call away in an emergency.
Last but not the least, smart phones access at early age teaches kids to become self independent. These days most of the financial transcations are being done online, as this is the age of internet banking, therefore parents can transfer pocket money of thier kids directly into thier online account, which is beneficial both for kids as well as for parents because parents can have access to their transaction history and kids will become financial prudent as how to use money on thier in an effective way.
Is it possible to forbid chidren from technology which their parents use 24/7 in a day? Perhaps not. Therefore providing phones to kids beneficial for the parents as well as for the kids in order to keep pace with the digital world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ology, these days is part and parcel of ones life. Blanket ban or free access to sma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...bble telescope is all over the internet.Therefore children can have access to these photo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...bble telescope is all over the internet.Therefore children can have access to these photo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...n never spend whole day with thier kids.However, through smart phones they can communic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e with their kids anytime and anywhere. Moreover kids can also feel safe with access to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ount, which is beneficial both for kids as well as for parents because parents can have ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al prudent as how to use money on thier in an effective way. Is it possible to forbid chidren fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...parents use 24/7 in a day? Perhaps not. Therefore providing phones to kids beneficial for...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01644736842 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60604179951 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536184210526 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.680448371 48.9658058833 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249837945211 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104756219102 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577675651215 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15663195005 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275465828057 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.