Some people believe that a college or university education should be
available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be
available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you
agree with? Explain why.
Universities are playing critical roles in the improvement of society and people’s life and the core element of their function depends on the quality of the students. Some are of the view that higher education should be dedicated to good student and others say that all students should have the opportunity to attend university education. After weighting the evidences I Strongly agree with the view that only good Students should have the right to enter colleges and based on the following reasons I try to demonstrate my opinion.
The budgets that the universities have are not limitless. Universities both private and public ones have a certain amount of financial resources that should be directed to the best possible goals. It is absolutely true that designating budget for a talented or a hard worker student bring much better results that giving budget to the weak student and it’s not possible for them to accept all students applying to the universities. A hard worker student creates high quality knowledge and finally brings money to the university. On the other hand, accepting weak or uninterested students to universities bring nothing more that waste of time and resources for the universities and the governments. Hence, universities should better to support those who are passionate about their studies so as to spend their moneys in the most efficient ways.
Furthermore, it’s the hard working and talented students who bring knowledge and respect for the universities. The most important goal of a university is creating quality works for the society and getting prestige and respect by the world. Where could these items come from? Aside from having good professors and financial resources, the most important resources for making knowledge and prestige are the outstanding and elite student of universities. They absolutely should be taken into priority for entering universities. Further, if the weak students enter the universities the good student’s right would be ignored as they have taken a long journey to enter universities in opposite to those weak students. As results, we conclude that it’s again the high quality students that should be absorbed to universities.
However, some people may say there may be some reasons that universities accept all types of students as it increases the quantity of the educated people in society and brings more knowledge for scientific world as well. But the reality is that society and scientific world needs quality works and qualified research projects which would be created by only those who are passionate enough about science.
In general, we can conclude that although everyone should have the right to enter universities, but this does not mean that universities can accept all good and weak students to their programs as they should designate their resources to the best students so as to bring quality knowledge, prestige, and respect for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... The budgets that the universities have are not limitless. Universities both privat...
^^^
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... who are passionate about their studies so as to spend their moneys in the most efficien...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...te their resources to the best students so as to bring quality knowledge, prestige, and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, as to, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28723404255 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85901162774 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434042553191 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8035353394 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.789473684 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7368421053 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183743638734 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066990884106 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634580466439 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131124198698 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829097159471 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.