Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Humans have completely changed their way of living. Early human beings lived in caves and hunted animals for food, whereas now we live in a developed world where animals and crops are grown by some farmers and this is then transferred to other urban areas. So, I think for making the above change we have damaged the ecosystem in a crucial way.

First, human activities have destroyed the natural habitat of many species. In order to develop urban areas and increase the agriculture area for more crops production, many forests areas have been cut down thus reducing the home of animals. As a result, many species started declining in numbers. This scenario was further exacerbated by hunting done by humans for fun, adventure, or desire. Some of the species even became extinct.

Second, humans have exploited the natural resources to the point of exhaustion. A study concluded that by 2030 the natural resource of fossil fuels will be empty, and that’s why electric cars are being developed. The fossil fuels that we used took millions of years to form and will soon be exhausted. Moreover, the use of these fuels released harmful greenhouse gases which not only takes lives of the hundreds of thousands of people every year but is causing global warming too. Another exploited resource is coal which is used to produce the major percentage of electricity consumed worldwide, and this has also contributed to the pollution of the environment we live in.

Lately, however, people have understood these problems caused us and now an intense research is being carried out to find alternate non-conventional renewable sources of energy such as solar energy, wind energy, ocean thermal energy, etc. Nevertheless, wars and nuclear bombs are still destroying our ecosystem and if not stopped might be the cause of the extinction of humans and other species too.

In conclusion, I agree that human activities have inevitably proven good for humans themselves but not for the environment and other species living on this planet. They have destroyed natural habitat, exhausted the natural resources, polluted the environment, and has caused global warming one of the biggest problem currently for humans survival.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a crucial way" with adverb for "crucial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ve change we have damaged the ecosystem in a crucial way. First, human activities have destr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...y humans for fun, adventure, or desire. Some of the species even became extinct. Second...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llution of the environment we live in. Lately, however, people have understood ...
^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intense research'.
Suggestion: intense research
...rstood these problems caused us and now an intense research is being carried out to find alternate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, thus, whereas, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18055555556 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65772662297 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3902698449 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.705882353 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179643023458 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606057130552 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381370199696 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100817508305 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277267104248 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.