Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork, which of the two approaches do you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubts, having interaction between parents and children is one of the prominent needs and trends which are embedded in human's spirit. A controversial question regard this issue is whether in busy families it is adequate parents to have funny times with their children or devote this time to evaluate their children's performance. A plethora people are inclines towards this idea that it is reasonable parents dedicate amount of time for doing a task by accompany with their children, while others believe having fun with children sway to the other deeds. I do find the idea of the former group more in accordance with that of mine. To support of my stance, in the course of this essay, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
To begin with, being educated and sophisticated person is the crucial aim which is in the top priority of individual's aim and dream. Being prosperous is seeded in the early age of every one's life and there in inextricable intertwining between being flourish in the future life and being well-educated in the childhood. It is crystal clear there is closely emotionally ties between parents and their children, since they can be a unique and un-example role model for every individual. In this way parents not only can discover and find out their adults' inner talent, but also motivate the adults to be more enthusiastic in the study. Hardly anyone can deny that the crucial role of every parent is to prime their own child-school to the future life. Every attempt are focus on bringing up a well-educated off spring due to have a flourishing life in the near future when he or she attend real world.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that this doing a task in common gives opportunity to parents to convey their own invaluable experiences to their children. It is evitable to learn how to deal with the difficulties, how to face the dilemmas, how to overcome the obstacles of the future life. It is controvertibly axiomatic, life is replete with ups and downs and reaching to the zenith is highly depends on having broaden view in this regard. In addition, in school these striking and profound tasks are overlooked and do not tutor to students. Thus, wise parents try the best to prime their children elaborately. For example, imagine a person who has not any knowledge about a simple task like time managing; who should learn time managing to him or her? How her or his parent can expect he or she has rational and elaborately treatment in the professional life? Obviously, the answer of this question itself indicates the pronounced importance of this fact.
In brief, all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that having done a take in accompany with children will give an opportunity for parents to transfer vital experiences to young children which is not found anywhere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Hardly' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...s to be more enthusiastic in the study. Hardly anyone can deny that the crucial role o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 881, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attends'.
Suggestion: attends
... life in the near future when he or she attend real world. Another reason which de...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8950617284 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76452638632 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522633744856 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.994623655914 402% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4010080528 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.95 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27247330991 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774407667109 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842803347387 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16395100911 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104902089698 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.