Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which do you prefer and why?

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which do you prefer and why?

In today's hectic city of life, in which life has trials and tribulations, vast majorities of human beings set various goals in order to achieve success. Life difficulties are in different forms and shapes and they can be sweet or painful as well. But every mature human being has to admit that success will be a blank dream without difficulties. Some people believe that they should rely on whimsical dreams in their personal lives. But others take a radically different view and point out that they should set realistic goals because they are more significant in life. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that people should bend over backward to keep track of their realistic goals in order to gain success and fortune. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.

To commence with, success is one of the utmost important goals in life of most people and myriads of individuals work hard and make efforts so as to make a progress day in day out. But people have to take different positive and negative aspects of their goals into consideration whether they should think realistically or ambitiously. Generally phrased, although ambitious dreams patronize people to think of their goals, it is realism that helps people gain what they want. As a palpable example, majorities of people are willing to continue their education and reach a tertiary education in their personal lives. This dream will come true only if people think wisely and realistically because it provides support and incentive for people to become a self-sufficient person in near future. To elucidate more on this issue, by realistic goals not only can individuals reach a conspicuous success but also can make a progress day in day out.

Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that if people set realistic goals in their lives, they will think of their dreams more persistently. If we take a minute to ponder over it, life is full of difficulties and people have to pass various obstacles and barriers in order to overcome the pressure. In fact, hardly can ambitious dreams improve people's determination to persist for a goal. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that not only can realistic goals provide support and incentive but also can help people move forward and explore a new life.

However, every coin has two sides. The startling fact which flabbergasted and bewildered me is that crowds of people are inclined toward the opinion that ambitious dreams are not useful and helpful. But in some case, these dreams could result in an impressive success. For instance, Madam Curie won a Nobel Prize for her old dream because she made her efforts so as to discover Radium, one of the most significant elements in today's world of chemistry. This example can show how a far-reaching dream could result in a long-lasting success. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.

In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... individuals work hard and make efforts so as to make a progress day in day out. But peo...
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... old dream because she made her efforts so as to discover Radium, one of the most signif...
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, for instance, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93109869646 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72903106006 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47113594041 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8539102408 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232041947776 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717145545597 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527685337199 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123863758161 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668742114769 0.0645574589148 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.