Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Internet inked the corners around the world and uncountable information had brought benefits to people. Simultaneously, some people may blame that the Internet had caused some troubles. I think Internet had never created too much information and disturb us. With plentiful information, we can make conclusions more appropriately. Information had exist for a long time, Internet is the gate which brings data to users. The potential faults were made by producers instead of the Internet and can be amend quickly through the Internet.
People who argue that too much information caused problems. I disagree with that since with more comparative materials, we can compare objects completely. More information means we can observe other people's experiences. To distinguish the accuracy is the ability we all should have in this modern world.
Information can only be more and cannot be reduced since the accumulations of findings and development of human societies. Internet is a bridge which connect people in the global generation. It is not the Internet itself who creates so much information but the producers. It is inevitable that the information is bulging and we should cherish this since we are discovering the truth of the world.
People who refutes the Internet offers wrong information is confused by the wrong impression. Faults are commonly seen from the beginning of human civilization. The Internet is boundless and can discover many mistakes soon thanks to numerous participation from the world. Internet had fasten the speed to correct errors.
Internet can boost the development of people and decrease the mistakes faster. The more information we have, the more knowledge we can have. To separate the faults and accurate facts takes time and patients to learn. This cannot be a criticism that the Internet is harmful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ons more appropriately. Information had exist for a long time, Internet is the gate w...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ons more appropriately. Information had exist for a long time, Internet is the gate w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...had fasten the speed to correct errors. Internet can boost the development of pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35395189003 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94702742684 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1301066007 48.9658058833 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8181818182 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2272727273 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.13636363636 5.45110844103 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252911082889 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853031040876 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619924016272 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155017057204 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527122945348 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.86 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.