Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to pretect the environment is better, but some people say the traditional energy source such as coal and oil is less expensice, what is your suggestion.
Energy is always a very hot issue in the world. Some people support that human should use a cleaner way to obtain the energy supplying the life, whereas others only care about whether the energy is cheaper or not. In my perspectives, I believe that the energy with no pollution definitely is human's goal in the future that we need to pursue it. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
First of all, clean energy is not going to say that it will be much expensive. For example, solar energy is extremely clean power. The panels which use to absorb the solar light and transfer to the power are not expensive to buy it or produce it. Although we now still rare take this method to produce the energy largely ( because its power transformation rate is not so great at this moment ), when this method gets breakthrough, it will easy to replace others energy.
Second, the traditional energy source is becoming much less than before such as fuel. According to the research conducted by Executive Yuan in my country, the remaining fuel is few to which human could only use more 70 or 80 years roughly. In fact, the contributing factor lies in the fact that while the entire world of remaining fuel still has a lot, most of them are hard to explore it. Some fuel are storing in the deep ocean that we need to spend thousands of time of money to mine it. Thus, we should not only consider that the traditional energy is cheaper now and use it as much as we can.
Third, even if we assume the traditional energy source is not limited, we still need to develop a much greater way to create the energy to protect the environment. It is because that if Earth is collapse due to the pollution, we cannot use traditional energy source anymore because we are not going to live in this world. Therefore, protecting Earth is more important than everything. People in this world should have the conscience to our Earth.
To sum up, although we have to rely on traditional energy so far, I am of the opinion that people should try their best to use or develop clean energy to protect our homeland.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...extremely clean power. The panels which use to absorb the solar light and transfer ...
^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his method to produce the energy largely because its power transformation rate is...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion rate is not so great at this moment , when this method gets breakthrough, it...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on rate is not so great at this moment , when this method gets breakthrough, it w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, whereas, while, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52368421053 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44461102496 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2625207053 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252751668642 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831651727209 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695123693053 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152483483351 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411072855806 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.