Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether educational institutions should dissuade students to give up the pursuit on which they are unlikely to succeed. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find some support such institutions should lead students on the right path and avoid to waste time to pursue somethings could be never successful, while others hold the different attitude that students should have the chance to seek which they want to pursue. As far as I concerned, I believe that educational institutions have a responsibility to encourage students to search what they want and not hinder them to do that. The following discussion will explore my view.
In general, the goal of educational institutions is to teach students and let them have enough knowledge to seek their dream. Also, when they are doing wrong during the time of the seeking, educational institutions should give them appropriate teaching to make them go back to the right path again, especially as they provide many efforts but still cannot close to their goal.
On the other hand, no matter which educational institutions as long as they are responsible for the future of the students, it will not suggest them quit the dream only because of the dream seems implausible to them. This is because, first, if the suggestion is responsible to students and consider the advantages and disadvantages from the position of students, it must have a premise: educational institutions are very sure that the pursuing of students are impossible to achieve. However, if students do not invest all their mind and tears in working hard for dreams, who would sure whether their deals will succeed in the first place? There are so many things we never thought before, but all become the reality, isn't? Secondly, if the recommendations in the topic are implemented, the result will be very simple: to annihilate the dream, to be self-styled, and to never develop and progress. Such result totally contrasts to the claim which educational institutions want to implement.
In fact, the right method is not stopping them to find their idea goal but encourage them to do it. At the same time, educational institutions have to guide and aid them when students are in exploration, therefore, they may cost at the least spend whether they are successful or failure. Pursuing dreams will definitely pay prices, but human civilization is just established by such cost. Thus, educational institutions should not forbid them is correct.
In conclusion, despite the fact that educational institutions have a responsibility to stop students excessive pay for dreams, there are many other factors we should consider discreetly. Therefore, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ght before, but all become the reality, isnt? Secondly, if the recommendations in th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2004454343 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98392277381 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489977728285 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.8087284477 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.722222222 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9444444444 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269008967231 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900446114074 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725403433297 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153465189513 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739265925252 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.