Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to pretect the environment is better, but some people say the traditional energy source such as coal and oil is less expensice, what is your suggestion.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Energy is always a very hot issue in the world. Some people support that human should use a clean way to obtain the energy supplying the life, whereas others only care whether the energy is cheap or not. In my perspectives, I believe that the energy with no pollution definitely is human's goal in the future that we need to pursue it. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
First of all, clean energy is not going to say that it will be much expensive. For example, solar energy is extremely clean power. The panels which use to absorb the solar light and transfer to the power are not expensive to buy it or produce it. Although we now still rare take this method to produce the energy largely( because its power transformation rate is not so great at this moment), when this method gets breakthrough, it will easy to replace others energy.
Second, the traditional energy source is becoming much less than before such as fuel. According to the research conducted by Executive Yuan in my country, the remaining fuel is few to which human could only use more 70 or 80 years roughly. In fact, the contributing factor lies in the fact that while the entire world of remaining fuel still has a lot, most of them are hard to explore it. Some fuel are storing in the deep ocean that we need to spend thousands of time of money to mine it. Thus, we should not only consider that the traditional energy is cheaper now and use it as much as we can.
Third, even if we assume the traditional energy source is not limited, we still need to develop a much greater way to create the energy to protect the environment. It is because that if Earth is collapse due to the pollution, we cannot use traditional energy source anymore because we are not going to live in this world. Therefore, protecting Earth is more important than everything. People in this world should have the conscience to our Earth.
To sum up, although we have to rely on traditional energy so far, I am of the opinion that people should try their best to use or develop clean energy to protect our homeland.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...extremely clean power. The panels which use to absorb the solar light and transfer ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, whereas, while, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62729658793 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82957649201 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496062992126 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8720001155 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9444444444 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241894961338 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795585743388 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663737608486 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144430194467 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319330334362 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.