Some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Automobiles are inarguably the most popular and most widely used means of transportation in the world even though the use of automobiles comes with concomitant cons like air pollution and road accidents. However, I believe that, overall, using automobiles has improved modern life due to two main reasons.
To start with, automobiles have made it easier to move from one place to another on land compare to the means of transportation used in the past; for example, the use of horses and camels. People can now move from their place of work to their place of abode with minimal stress. With use of automobiles, students can go to school and come back home with ease. As a science teacher, I make use of cars from my home to my workplace every day with feeling stressed up. Without these vehicles, I may have to trek down to school every morning and that may make me feel tired even before I start the day’s work. Hence, negatively impact my ability to discharge my duties. Because automobiles aid our movement from place to place, thereby making it possible for us to focus on more important things, I believe it has positively affected modern life.
In addition, I hold to the opinion that automobile has improved modern life because it makes possible to move perishable goods from one part of a country to another within hours. Goods that may get spoilt if they spend too much time in transit can be quickly delivered to the consumers. For instance, tomatoes are mainly planted in the northern part of Nigeria and they are transported to the southern part of the country. The use automobile is a cost-effective and fast way to get these vegetables to the southern part of the country with a day or two. So, by making it possible to quickly transport easily degradable goods from one part of a country to another in a cheap way, I believe automobile has improved modern life.
In conclusion, I believe that automobiles have improved human life because they make it easy to move from one place to another thereby make it possible to focus on important thing and they also make it possible to transport goods from one place to another in a cost-effective way.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- Some people think that the automobile has improved modern life Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 73
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new place Why do you think people visit museums Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cheap way" with adverb for "cheap"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s from one part of a country to another in a cheap way, I believe automobile has improved mode...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cost-effective way" with adverb for "cost-effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ansport goods from one place to another in a cost-effective way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71503957784 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66834074431 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469656992084 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.481969043 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.133333333 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150612166507 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062751608037 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576420508426 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111486256758 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527798631044 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.