Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children as good citizens and workers To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children as good citizens and workers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, with skyrocketing development of technology, we are endowed with better living standards. Hence, more and more people turn from just making a living to pursuing success and bright future. Among all the factors, education is one of the hottest topics for people nowadays to discuss, and in terms of school’s main function, two antithetical viewpoints emerge. Some contends that schools are mainly supposed to cultivate good citizens and workers, while the others disagree. From my perspective, I stand for the latter, in that the main purpose of schools is to impart knowledge and it is the parents that should take the responsibility.

To begin with, schools are places where students absorb knowledge. For most schools all over the world right now, teachers’ main duty is to teach students some basic knowledge, which tells the students how the world works. Among them are Math, Science and Literature etc. Take Science as an example. It helps to explain how the nature work specifically, like chemical principals and physics laws. The purpose of teaching these subjects is not only to let the students become a normal person with basic knowledge, but also, more importantly, to cultivate their creativity and interest in study. If schools are satisfied with fostering normal people, then scientific breakthroughs would be impossible. Only by holding the intention to impart knowledge and cultivate creativity, rather than just to raise common citizens or workers, will human beings gain more progress and achievements.

Meanwhile, school’s responsibility of producing good citizens and workers is just limited. Teachers are not very likely to totally convince all students, since teachers are neither their family members nor their friends of similar age. Hence, there is the strong possibility that teachers and students cannot understand each other, especially when the two parties are coming from different backgrounds. Also, most teachers’ academic duty, as mentioned above, is to impart knowledge and encourage interests and imagination. Thus, they may not have enough time or effort to cultivate students to become good citizens or workers. Instead, parents or other senior family members should be held accountable for this part, since they spend more time with their children, compared to teachers. Also, they will accompany their children for decades, so their impact on children is remarkable and long-lasting.

As a matter of fact, there still can be some moral courses in schools, which tells them how to become a truly mature adult rather than to stay childish. Hence, we can tell that even though it is not the main responsibility for the schools to foster the children's citizenship quality, many schools are trying to make up for what parents may lack in their children's moral and behavioral education.

From what I have explained above, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that school's main purpose is not to make students potentially good citizens and workers, but to equip them with affluent knowledge that may benefit them for the whole life. Also, the main burden should fall on the family, especially parents, to educate their children how to become socially responsible, to behave well and to become a good worker.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as a matter of fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2755.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30828516378 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75147477087 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.540223716 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.791666667 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220324807505 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619422317868 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627252563821 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138178331439 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515987317743 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.