Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship. Because being away from reminds us how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate with them more often
It is no secret to anyone that human per se is gregarious. Our current hectic-intricate world makes it necessary to create relationship networks. Regarding this issue, a prevalent topic undergoing question is that should be away from people to improve the relationship or being close together to have a good relationship. I am to a great extent, of the belief that being away from others provide humans with many opportunities like improving their relationship and in the same token, get a better understanding of themselves turning into having a better relationship. In the ensuing paragraph, I will delve into some conspicuous aspects persuading me toward this opinion.
It is crystal clear that family and friends are the most important and precious assets which everyone has. As a matter of fact, all humans tend to have a great relationship with important others and to content this tendency will do lots of things. Some, the majority of people if I do not exaggerate, decide to be away from the people Since in this way they understand the real value of each person in their life. The rationale behind this erratic decision lies behind the idea that when we meet each other repeatedly and daily, we most likely behave badly toward others due to the fact that it is not important and it is a usual situation happening for all people. To put in general, they do not cherish and prized each other. As I remember, when I was reading a local newspaper in the field of family therapy, I saw the results of recent research has carried out in one of the largest cities in Iran. The results revealed that living in a crowded city brings about not having the chance of visiting each other continuously which consequently causing people to know the value of their relationship. Briefly stated the more distance between people, the more excellent relationship.
The second reason is meriting some words to say is, the opportunity to be away from others, people try to introspect and experience loneliness. This kind of feeling not only is not bad at all but also has lots of good consequences. One of the best results of such experience is getting a comprehensive understanding of himself turning out to have a better understanding of others. When we know our self better, it is more probable to have a good relationship with our close friends and family. Knowing about themselves, they will try to grasp what things important for others in order to satisfy them and make them happier.
All in all, being away from others provides people with the chance of knowing the real value of others. By the same token, if they are alone and prospect themselves, they will obtain a better knowledge of themselves. Therefore, they try to do the same for others giving rise to have a better and mature relationship.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, in general, kind of, as a matter of fact, by the same token, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82744282744 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82834766004 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482328482328 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4103813434 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9047619048 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368577177241 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101887327417 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079213381005 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238754230468 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241936728296 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.