Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media are less concerned about accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problems to the public.
In our communal world, we are living, no one can ignore the monumental function of media and other communal means informing people from happening events all over the world. Regarding this prominent role of media in transferring news, a prevalent topic undergoing debate is that nowadays media is not concerned about the accuracy of news that it was in the past. Although people ̓s opinion toward this issue vary from person to person, I am to a great extent, of the opinion that media reports news as accurate as it did in the past and I have a couple of reasons to support my idea.
First and foremost reason occurs in my mind is that in our modernized era with the galloping rate of information technology development, it is really impossible that some news sources tend to give information imprecisely. In fact, because of the availability of the vast variety of substitute news sources, they are not able to act in this way. If such a thing happen, albeit it is impossible, people will incline to other means of information. Therefore, the inaccurate source will lose its position between audience so it will be replaced by the rival means. In other words, because of accessibility to numerous tools, people always have rights to choice and if one news source does not do it ̓s responsibility well, it will be eliminated. To clarify, take an example. In my country, Iran, after voting election, the government used censorship to prevent people from informing of precise data, so my nation as a reaction decreased using national media and installed telegram as a replacement for gaining right news.
The second reason alongside the first reason is that all social media set taking more audience as their main goal and all of their behavior are directed by the mentioned objective. By keeping this point in mind, it is obvious that they will try to be away from mistakes causing failures. If they do mistakes, in the near future they will lose their reputation. Then people cannot trust them which I suppose such a thing is the worst thing can happen for a media. So it is conceivable that they will avoid reporting inaccurate knowledge.
All in all, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of media, especially in reporting news. In order to appeal more and more audience, they will avoid reporting inaccurate information since in this way they will lose their reputation and also because of the availability of substitution media, they will lose their audience
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reports'' or 'report's'?
Suggestion: reports'; report's
...great extent, of the opinion that media reports news as accurate as it did in the past ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'rights'.
Suggestion: have always rights
...accessibility to numerous tools, people always have rights to choice and if one news source does n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...thing is the worst thing can happen for a media. So it is conceivable that they will av...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, well, i suppose, in fact, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83529411765 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73611347627 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0415911485 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171856787397 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05423262004 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523794642583 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110393069171 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491746091788 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.