We all work or will work in jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion what are some important characteristic of a co-worker?
It goes without saying that in our modernized-hectic world where we are living, all of the people need to work to have a better life. As humans spend their best time at work, it is remarkably monumental to work with workers who have specific temperament making the workplace a better one. Although people ̓s attitudes toward this issue vary person to person, In my vantage point being cooperative and by the same token having a can-do attitude are the most important personality traits which they should possess. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into some conspicuous aspects persuading me into this opinion.
First and foremost, it is crystal clear that when co-worker tends to be cooperative people, their colleagues will be more enthusiastic to work jointly with them. To put in general words, in the workplace no one performs task solitary as all duties will be done better in a collaborative manner. Therefore if the people who work there do not asset teamwork skills, other workers will face with lots of problems either in doing things well and their inclination to career. It is obvious that workers altogether are constituents of a well or a worse job environment which these kinds of situation can be encouraging or discouraging depending on the sphere. I have worked in a lot of organizations for many years. Although I am always interested in my occupation, working with people who were not inclined to tasks jointly caused me to become reluctant and ultimately submitted my resignation of the company. Had my colleagues being cooperative, I would continue my work.
The other compelling characteristic which co-worker should have is having a positive can-do attitude. In other words, they should believe that their efforts will totally culminate in to a great success and most importantly they persuade of having an intense potential to satisfy this kind of thought. As a matter of fact, working with positive and powerful people, they are able to feel inner powers which propels them to a successful future. Not only do become successful in the long run but also feel lively and happy in the current workplace.
To wrap it up, no one can ignore the significance of personality traits of co-workers on the quality of work. Due to the fact that all members of a given company work along with each other, it seems that tendency of cooperation and possessing a can-do attitude will help workers in experiencing a lively sphere which leads them to a successful future at last.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nized-hectic world where we are living, all of the people need to work to have a better li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a collaborative manner" with adverb for "collaborative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...itary as all duties will be done better in a collaborative manner. Therefore if the people who work there...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... done better in a collaborative manner. Therefore if the people who work there do not ass...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a lively sphere which leads them to a successful future at last.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in general, kind of, as a matter of fact, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95476190476 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87487651317 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6662797644 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.411764706 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318133972665 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100247178933 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489962378846 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188786397524 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040183999983 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.