Do you agree or with the following statement? The government should spend money helping more people access to the internet instead of improving public transportation.
As time marches on, with the galloping rate of technology advancement, the governments have been starting to alter their strategy in regard to invest the region ̓s budget. It is crystal clear that there are a vast variety of sources to get attention from governments but according to the society ̓s demands can vary. Currently, a prevalent topic undergoing debate is that should the governments spend money to improve transportation or provide a better opportunity to access the internet. I am to a great extent, of the opinion that it would be much more beneficial for society to have improved access to the internet. In the following essay, I will substantiate my vantage point.
First and foremost reason springs in my mind is that the quality of access to the internet can be seen as an indication of the progression level of each given society. In other words, the more developed country, the more having the chance to connect via the internet. Therefore, a prosperous society many years ago has facilitated the system of transportation. Consequently, at the present time, the governments have the chance of putting their budget into more important tasks like speeding up and widening the internet cable. Reading an electronic format of Times news magazine, I saw the results of a recent survey carried in an high-developed city. According to the people ̓s attitude in the questionnaire, they would prefer that government invest more in improving the communal medium rather than other fields.
Alongside the first reason elaborated above another reason which needs meticulous attention is that by making the internet better, in fact, we indirectly are improving the transportation as well. In other words, in our modernized era which we are living, many numbers of toils can be done through the internet instead of using transportation. As a matter of fact, people take advantage of the internet in quite a few different ways like ordering food online, shopping for clothes and also taking a taxi. If a society does not possess a high-speed internet, it will confront with lots of problems which definitely one of them is people dissatisfaction leading to a lower level of welfare.
To wrap it up, no one can cast a debate on the vital significance of the internet, especially in our episode. Therefore, by improving the internet government not only can take advantage of becoming more developed, but also can raise the welfare level of the whole society. Simply stated, doing this, it can kill two birds with one stone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e results of a recent survey carried in an high-developed city. According to the p...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation. As a matter of fact, people take advantage of the internet in quite a few...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words, in regard to, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0380952381 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93497557616 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8102776893 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280653628463 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799482314936 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548127451725 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160925507857 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454407260789 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.