Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take too many jobs away from humans who are currently paid to do them.
No one can ignore the fact that nowadays after the development of technology, the magnitude use of robots and computers significantly increase. Subsequently, people concern about one day which humans are replaced by computers and robots causing many negative effects. I am to a great extent, of the belief that if this kind of thing happens, we will face with lots of problem in the near future.
Today we witness lots of innovation in creating machines and robots using a computer to work properly. In fact, they design for doing tasks in a way that human cannot do it. It is acceptable until that it does not turn into a barrier for the human workforce. Up to the present time, such a thing have not happened, although it is imaginable to occur in near future. In this way, our world will convert to a wholly mechanical planet which machines will get the human ̓s place and do their works. Therefore not only do we confront with increasing numbers of unemployment but also there is no need for the human who himself create such a tool. According to the results of a study has carried in one of the high-developed countries, it was characterized by entering a novel instrument to a factory, about thousands of workers were discharged and unemployed. Although first the rate of production increased, in the long run, due to the increment of unemployment the prosperity of society dropped. In the summary, over utilization of robots will bring about unemployment and useless of workforce.
Alongside the first reason elaborated above, inability of the machine to work with itself is another point which needs meticulous attention. In other words, all the artificial means are created by human ̓s hand. Once something bad happens to the machine, no one can fix it except human. Therefore, there is always a drastic need for human capital to work adjacent to the apparatus. In addition, regarding the fact that all machines have short longevity which means one day suddenly will break down, humans always should be in own position in the workplace and it is impossible to consider robots as a substitution for human beings. So in order to have a successful and prosperous community, we should have both humans and machines altogether.
To recapitulate all of the aforementioned reasons, needless to say in our episode machines have a monumental function which can not be ignored. We cannot imagine one day which machines can be replaced by human because of the crucial role of workers in both utilizing and repairing these tools. Moreover, since human makes this apparatus. only himself can regulate it to work properly. So the presence of a human with machines is an inevitable fact
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...ind of thing happens, we will face with lots of problem in the near future. Today we witness ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... the human ̓s place and do their works. Therefore not only do we confront with increasing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d machines altogether. To recapitulate all of the aforementioned reasons, needless to say...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...over, since human makes this apparatus. only himself can regulate it to work properl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, kind of, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84025439756 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9391548829 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0869565217 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7826086957 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260014568611 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722997741064 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538290762608 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158244122885 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507546690647 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.