Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take too many jobs away from humans who are currently paid to do them. Which view do you agree with and why?
There are some moot points about the positive and the negative aspects of robots and computers in humans life. The question of whether these kinds of technologies are helpful for humans or not has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that robots and computers are very beneficial for people's lives. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be expounded in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that nowadays due to arduous and problematic moderns lives everything which facilitates people's lives are very helpful and popular. In the hectic life individuals struggle with various things, therefore, everything can diminish these tensions are considered lucrative things. In order to advancement in technologies, robots, and computers play pivotal roles in our life. As a case to the point, I vividly remember two weeks ago I went to the new technologies exhibition. In that place, I saw the huge variety of new inventions which were very amazing and beneficial. One of that devices was a new sweeper which was a robot. This sweeper worked in the house when their sensors displayed any craps in the ground. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that the new invention has many positive aspects in our life.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that the population increase in this era leads to demand for something increase dramatically. Robots and computers can cooperate with humans to balance this demand consequently, these devices have many advantages in our life. My personal example demonstrates this reality, my last project in the university related to car manufactures. In that project, I had some observation among these companies. One of the most prominent companies which were very famous in my country had some robotic producing lines. In these lines, some robots worked as some humans. I noticed that these techniques help them to optimal their productions. My personal experience shed some light to the point that in modern lives we need to use these kinds of technologies.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, robots and computers are very helpful in this era. These devices not only ameliorate and facilitate our life but also have more exploitation for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...of robots and computers in humans life. The question of whether these kinds of technologies are helpful...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...emember two weeks ago I went to the new technologies exhibition. In that place, I saw the hu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 823, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ntly corroborates to the point that the new invention has many positive aspects in our life. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12814070352 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90050865031 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515075376884 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5244144414 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7727272727 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253450862381 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733865623451 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584720305359 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170748339321 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841143123323 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.