Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations?
There are some moot points about compare and contrast the way of our life with that of our parents. The question of which way of life is better for the next generation has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. When it comes to my position, weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that our parents' life was more difficult than our life. As a consequence, today's life is more satisfying for the next generations. I have some reasons the most outstanding of it will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that nowadays, due to development in technology, the quality of people life is very better than the previous time. Technology advancement in many areas with galloping progress make our life easier than our parents' life, therefore, it is more pleasant for the next generations. As a case to the point, I vividly remember two days ago I visited my cousin who is 8 years old. He wanted some Playstation games for playing. While he had not any permission to go and buy games, he ordered the game on the internet. After five hours, his games received. I vividly remember when I was a boy in my cousin aged, I had to wait many times to go to the market and bought anything I needed. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that today's life is very easier than our parent's life.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that nowadays the number of family members are decreased dramatically rather than past time. Each family has one or two kids. Hence, the quality of children lives increased gradually. In our parents' era, each family had more children with a low rate of brood. My personal example demonstrates this reality, my cousin who above mentioned has everything he needs. For instance, he has the piano mentor who instructs him the piano. On the other hand, my father stated that he was very eager to learn the piano but, owing to the number of his family members, his father could not afford the cost of the piano teacher. Thus, my father deprived of piano playing. My personal example shed some light to the point that today's life is very pleased than the past and the next generation are more satisfying with this kind of life.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, with comparing and contrasting life, I vehemently assert that today's life is better than our parent's life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 785, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...petently corroborates to the point that todays life is very easier than our parents li...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... are decreased dramatically rather than past time. Each family has one or two kids. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ample shed some light to the point that todays life is very pleased than the past and ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...trasting life, I vehemently assert that todays life is better than our parents life. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, kind of, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69444444444 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61376523238 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.137052319 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1739130435 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227968395622 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684485273478 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857562728987 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176817537722 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923944023474 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.