Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every student has his own method of learning, and therefore lecturers cannot consider all ideas of them. In my opinion, we can learn more interactively from classes with discussions and that is the best method for learning. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, classes with discussion develop our soft skills like communications among others, and it will help us when we go to the industry. Though we just learn theories in the classroom in the industry we have to interact with others and we have to speak with others to convey our ideas to them. Without communication among others, we cannot be successful in our future career paths. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in university a lot of lecturers give an opportunity to discuss among others about our ideas. In this case, we learned to defence our ideas as well as recognize week points in our opinions. With this experience when I go to work as a Software Engineer I feel confident with my self and without hesitation, I present my opinions to the team. This skill helps me to work freely and successfully.
Secondly, frequent discussions in the classroom help students to learn things more enjoyable way. If the lecturer teaches his subject without any discussion, students feel bored and they may feel sleepy while learning. In this case, students learning ability is decreased and they may not what lecturer want to receive from the lesson. For instance, when I was the school I learned chemistry from very old teacher. That teacher taught us with long lectures without giving any chance to discuss the details among our selves. Because of this reason, a lot of student in our class could not score marks for the chemistry subject. With this problem, our principal assigned new teacher to our class and her teaching method with a lot of discussion help students to score more marks and one student in our class managed to select for the national chemistry quiz competition with this knowledge.
In conclusion, I feel that having more frequent discussions in the class will make the best students. This is because discussions help students to improve their soft skills and form discussion children gain a lot of knowledge than having just lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rience is a compelling example of this. When I was in university a lot of lecturers ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 549, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of students'.
Suggestion: a lot of students
...ong our selves. Because of this reason, a lot of student in our class could not score marks for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90051020408 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6691318119 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0668526219 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.05 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233861445972 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772392394259 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566238822903 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153039095622 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430130081969 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.