The reading and the lecture are both about driverless cars. The author of the reading feels that driverless cars cure problems create by the humans. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that facts described by the author are faulty and lecturer claims facts to undermine the authors argument.
To begin with, the author argues that driverless cars are more safer than human drivers, since technologies make less errors than humans. The writer mentions that such vehicles can drive very long distance without making accidents. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that these softwares prone to make errors because softwares are created by people. Additionally, he says in the last month the driverless car made an accident with other vehicle to bolster the his claim.
Secondly, the writer suggests self-driving vehicles are more efficient and it will reduce the environmental pollution. In the article, it is said that driverless cars reduce the traffic jams by vehicle to vehicle commuication. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning self-driving cars lead to increse the usage of cars, which will result in increasing pollution even these cars are efficient. He eloborates on this by bringing up the point that more people become driving cars since there is no age limitations and no licence are needed.
Finally, the author posits that autonomous cars give more free time to passenger. Moreover, it is stated in the article that passengers can focus on lesuire activities since driver no need to focus on driving. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that most probably this extra time would have used for work or it will be waste of time. He notes that people enjoy driving while listening to the music and from that driver will loose that opportunity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ars cure problems create by the humans. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... lecturer claims facts to undermine the authors argument. To begin with, the author...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
... author argues that driverless cars are more safer than human drivers, since technologies ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... human drivers, since technologies make less errors than humans. The writer mentions...
^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
... accident with other vehicle to bolster the his claim. Secondly, the writer suggests...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... to the music and from that driver will loose that opportunity.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1196013289 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62120561312 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554817275748 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4271875338 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6470588235 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11574185749 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410448614035 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474929302795 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713542472421 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295865927638 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.