Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lecture. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussion. Which do you prefer?
Some people say that the professor should give lectures without many discussions with students. However, there are many students who prefer the frequent discissions with almost no lectures with their professors. In my opinion, the professors should have more discussions with their students to get many benefits.
To begin with, for students, having discussion during classes can be a way to learn their subjects unconsciously. Qualified professors can use the discussion as a method to give an opportunity of self-learning to their students. Through many discussions, people can experience both positive and negative aspects of many topics. For example, when I was in my school years at university learning rehabilitation, I took a class about posture analysis. In the classroom, I sat in comfortable position leaning my back against my chair. Professor gave me a question as soon as he started his lecture. He asked me that is there a positive effect if he sit in a chair in the same position with me. I answered him that this posture makes me feel more comfortable compared to rigid position. Then he asked me about positive effects of rigid sitting position. I tried my best to give him an answer. Our discussion continued for a relatively long time and other students gave their interests to me and my professor. After I finished the conversation with him, I realized that he intentionally started this discussion to teach how to figure out the relation between bad position and lumbar curve of people. He perfectly gave his lecture to me and my classmates without boring handouts or presentations.
Second, discussion is helpful for students to understand their majors. Most of majors hold the most difficult subject among others such as human anatomy of kinesiology. Understanding that subject by reading books and having lectures is almost impossible to people. In this circumstance, having discussion with professor will give a solution to solve the problem. In my university, many professors used a teaching method which is called ‘red-man’. The one who selected as a red man have to deny every opinion of his classmates. Therefore, professors most likely played that role in their lecture. Since many professors gave their word that they will give A+ to the student who succeed to make an undeniable opinion, students tried hard to understand the most difficult subject among their courses and this process significantly helped the students to get better knowledge about their majors. In other words, the professors stimulated eagerness of the students about their subjects through the discussions in their classes.
In conclusion, having discussion in the classes by professors not only stimulate students to study hard but also can teach students about their subjects unconsciously. Therefore, I assert that professors should have more discussions with their students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sits'.
Suggestion: sits
...e that is there a positive effect if he sit in a chair in the same position with me...
^^^
Line 2, column 1290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout boring handouts or presentations. Second, discussion is helpful for studen...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the majors') or simply say ''Most majors''.
Suggestion: Most of the majors; Most majors
...or students to understand their majors. Most of majors hold the most difficult subject among o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more discussions with their students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27114967462 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01525616731 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479392624729 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5171184228 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0740740741 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96296296296 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344517475945 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10078635454 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109272659118 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27347400871 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146437518414 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.