At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
Nowadays, making appropriate and reliable daily schedule is very imperative for students at their universities. Some people argues that it is much better for students themselves to oversee and determine the whole procedure in the university as they possess more authentic information about the students themselves and earn more public supports. However, in my opinion, I suggest that it is still effective for professors to inspect the overall routine from the university.
First of all, professor actually possesses more professional knowledge, who can effectively implement beneficial and sustainable measures. Due to students are “students”, who are still in the phase of being imparted knowledge, they do not own enough useful and broad knowledge and practices. Hence most of the time these students would treat the school’s issues or make the regulations partially, leading to ineffective results in the long-term side. For instance, in our school, our schoolmates all enjoy beverages and fried foods because they are always tasty. They actually rarely know or aware of the negative effect of overconsuming such these types of food. Hence if we asked the students to determine the daily issue, undoubtedly they would ask dining hall to supply more of these foods. However, in the long term, even though our desire is met, it is absolutely detrimental to our students’ physical health, such as obesity or high blood pressure. Hence an invitation of the professor can effectively avoid the occurrence of such these problems as they can fully analyse and understand the negative effect of consuming these junk food, and what’s more, they can also provide more healthy and reasonable food types within using their own specific knowledge. Although there might be arguments among students, it really benefits them a lot in the long run after all.
Furthermore, some elected students might have some biased opinion that cannot consider everyone as a whole at university. Every student has his or her own thought and everyone is unique as different strokes have different folks. The elected students’ own idea cannot always be accepted by everyone at university, hence causing the student’s union decision ineffective. For example, in my sister’s school, which the regulation is mainly controlled by the student union, gets some flaws from their union. Union proclaimed that the university’s library would actually be opened until 4 o’clock in the morning. However, one of school’s female dormitories is in front of the library. The students who study during the nocturnal time really at library really treat students who want to sleep with a strong luminous environment, interfering their sleeping quality. However, be means of employing the professor, they will consider every student’s aspect and the overall comprehensive factor---such as students’ health, the pressure controlled factor--- as a whole, which is beneficial to everyone and can hardly create any prejudices among students.
Due to the limitation of the space, I am unable to give more ideas but i believe the case above have already proven the validity of my point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...eful and broad knowledge and practices. Hence most of the time these students would t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...overconsuming such these types of food. Hence if we asked the students to determine t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...such as obesity or high blood pressure. Hence an invitation of the professor can effe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ace, I am unable to give more ideas but i believe the case above have already pro...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, still, then, after all, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2678.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38832997988 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90322879126 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553319919517 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3645980356 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.523809524 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61904761905 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206831704693 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634780689956 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522605463392 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108757978807 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786508104433 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.